MK wrote:
> found this in amavisd.log (i inserted the line breaks
for better reading...):
>
############################################################
#################
> (!)WARN: Using cpio instead of pax can be a security
risk;
> please add: $pax='pax'; to amavisd.conf and check
that the pax(1) utility
> is available on the system!
> (!)do_pax_cpio/1: exit 1
> (!)Decoding of p003 (tar archive) failed, leaving it
unpacked:
> do_pax_cpio: exit 1 /usr/bin/cpio: Malformed number
777
> n/usr/bin/cpio: Malformed number 376
> n/usr/bin/cpio: Malformed number 1
> n/usr/bin/cpio: Malformed number 213000
> n/usr/bin/cpio: Malformed number 10450757133
> n/usr/bin/cpio: Malformed number
> n/usr/bin/cpio: Malformed number
> n/usr/bin/cpio: premature end of file at (eval 49)
line 1239.
>
############################################################
#################
> why can using cpio be a security risk? (i'm using
"cpio (GNU cpio) 2.7")
> and, if so, which pax version is advisable to choose?
> im confused about the current state of tar/pax/cpio
merging code or not...
> the heirloom toolchest contains pax, cpio and tar - so
do the GNU paxutils
> (although i don't find an actual download on
savannah.gnu.org - just CVS).
> which is best to choose?
> thanks
> MK
I personally have no real answers for you on this, but
doesn't your
distro have 'pax' available where you could simply install
the pax
package/port/whatever?
Gary V
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -
and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.
php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amav
is.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/ho
wto/
|