Mark Martinec wrote the following on 3/21/2007 6:51 AM
-0800:
> Bob,
>
>
>> ah, does SA get any indication that clamav thinks
the email is a phish?
>>
>
> No, currectly not. An artificial header field could be
inserted I guess,
> but for the moment I don't think it is really needed,
these phishing
> scams collect enough spam points by themselves.
>
I like the artificial header idea. If you could at least
make it an
optional flag that would be great. Would be nice to be able
to add a
few SA points if ClamAV detects phish, image, scam, etc.,
messages,
otherwise it doesn't make much sense to use the additional
ClamAV
signature files provided by SaneSucurity and MSRBL.
Bill
>
>> Otherwise I guess turning off phishing signatures
(as I currently have)
>> is pretty similar in affect.
>>
>
> ...except for the absence of additional 14 score
points,
> contributed by  virus_name_to_spam_score_maps.
>
> Mark
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief
surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.
php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-userlists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amav
is.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/ho
wto/
|
