Gary V wrote:
> So, as mentioned, you have two options. You can either
NULL out this
> field for this particular policy, or you can add a new
policy (I would
> suggest setting only the id, policy_name and spam_lover
fields and
> leave all the other fields at their default NULL
value)
Shouldn't we bypass_spam_checks ? Seems like a waste of CPU
when we
know that it's really spam.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance ... net philanthropy, open source and other
randomness
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and
a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amav
is.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/ho
wto/
|
