List Info

Thread: Unicode versus ANSI DB




Unicode versus ANSI DB
country flaguser name
United States
2007-04-17 19:09:07

Which should I use? (I know Unicode won't work on 95 and ME) Ignoring
that.....
Is there any reason to use Unicode if one is not planning to ever
translate software from English to another language?
Is there any penalty for working in a Unicode environment and making
software that is only in English? The documentation suggests there is
no penalty.
Will ANSI be phased out eventually and only Unicode versions of DB be
offered, so maybe just use Unicode now even if not needed?
Bottom line: Should one just use the Unicode versions regardless,
because any penalty is small?

Regards,
Ian

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___
Re: Unicode versus ANSI DB
country flaguser name
United Kingdom
2007-04-18 03:01:30

Hi Ian,

super8geek wrote:
> Which should I use? (I know Unicode won't work on 95 and ME) Ignoring
> that.....
> Is there any reason to use Unicode if one is not planning to ever
>; translate software from English to another language?
> Is there any penalty for working in a Unicode environment and making
> software that is only in English? The documentation suggests there is
> no penalty.
> Will ANSI be phased out eventually and only Unicode versions of DB be
> offered, so maybe just use Unicode now even if not needed?
> Bottom line: Should one just use the Unicode versions regardless,
> because any penalty is small?
>
Yes, Unicode is preferred, and ANSI builds of DialogBlocks will be
phased out altogether
when Win95/ME are no longer relevant. (In fact I'd like to stop
releasing ANSI builds but
there are a few people still working on these earlier OSes.)

There's no penalty that I can think of when using the Unicode build, and
you can create ANSI
apps with the Unicode version.

Regards,

Julian

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )