cache: the store_body interface

> Von:  
>  Justin Erenkrantz
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 16:15
> An: devhttpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: cache: the store_body interface
> 
> 
> On 10/31/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO 
> <ruediger.pluemvodafone.com> wrote:
> > That seems to be an important point to me.
Although I never used
> > the fd caching of mod_mem_cache this would mean we
actually would
> > have to dump this feature. This looks bad to me.
Isn't this 
> a showstopper
> > for implementing #3 as new interface?
> 
> Honestly, mod_mem_cache is a complete joke.  It's never
worked

I am not quite sure if Bill (not other Bill) shares this
point of view .

Regards

Rüdiger

> Von:  
>  Justin Erenkrantz
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 16:15
> An: devhttpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: cache: the store_body interface
> 
> 
> On 10/31/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO 
> <ruediger.pluemvodafone.com> wrote:
> > That seems to be an important point to me.
Although I never used
> > the fd caching of mod_mem_cache this would mean we
actually would
> > have to dump this feature. This looks bad to me.
Isn't this 
> a showstopper
> > for implementing #3 as new interface?
> 
> Honestly, mod_mem_cache is a complete joke.  It's never
worked

I am not quite sure if Bill (not other Bill) shares this
point of view .

Regards

Rüdiger