On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:47:49PM -0500, Webmaster wrote:
> Say whatever you want, I'm not going to argue when the
evidence is online
> for everyone to examine. Go look at the wiki at my
posting history, you
> will see how unfairly I have been treated.
I've done just that today, never having looked at it before.
In my
opinion, you have been treated fairly and have been given
substantial
leeway.
> Why not respond like you are supposed to and actually
SHOW me what is wrong,
> misleading, or poorly written?
You do not allow us to do so in the most efficient,
convenient,
accessible and collaborative manner - to edit them directly
with
comments. The people here are not free consultation for your
personal
website.
> Isn't that what the wiki is for? How can we
> improve content when it just gets deleted right away?
I don't have time to
> try to make a couple people like me.. thats silly, I go
to the wiki to
> contribute, share ideas, and learn about my favorite
software.
So why do you post so much "content" only in the
form of links? you
are mis-representing the problem here.
--
Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key:
colm+pgp stdlib.net
|
