Plüm wrote:
>
> I wouldn't say that it is a no-op on Unix. Some logger
programs might
> expect an open stderr, even if this points to
/dev/null. So I am not in
> favour of this patch. Besides I understood that we no
longer support
> Win9x. So why making an exception here?
> IMHO if things do not work correctly on Win9x, bad
luck.
I don't disagree. I raised it to point out why I
deliberately neglected it.
I went over your other observations, thank you for pointing
out the issues
with the patch. New one incoming.
Bill
|