List Info

Thread: Re: editor abstraction?




Re: editor abstraction?
user name
2007-01-26 03:09:27
Hi Jörn,

thanks for your ideas!

Joern Nettingsmeier schrieb:

[...]

> moreover, we would need to change image references
from
> lenya-document:... to some valid local file link before
passing them to
> the editor, so that it can do proper wysiwyg, and
change them back upon
> saving. which can be a little tricky.

This already happens for BXE and Kupu (for internal links
and images).

[...]

> andreas, where should the actual saving be implemented?
my gut feeling
> says that our editor code should just throw an xml tree
somewhere and
> not be concerned with file operations or streams.

What do you mean with "throw somewhere"?

> but which lenya
> component should handle that xml tree and store it? i'm
not too familiar
> with the DAV upload handler - can we simply use it for
all editors?

I guess WebDAV would be the easiest and a quite generic
way.
The major problem is the different behaviour of the
editors,
and the large amount of customization.

I guess the Neutron protocol (http://neutron.wyona.org/) is the most
promising step in this direction, but of course it depends
on the
acceptance by editor vendors.

-- Andreas


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribelenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helplenya.apache.org


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )