Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Jürgen Ragaller schrieb:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Meaning I hopefully
>>> can finish what we started - our first release
of 2.0.
>>>
>>> Subject says it, wdyt?
>>>
>>
>> -1
>>
>> 42385 still seems to be alive and blocking after
the toString()
>> patch. When the bug bites the result is too bad for
a release, I think.
>
> I agree, whereas IIUC the toString() patch didn't break
anything but
> just brought the flaws of my code to the surface
>
>> Help maybe on the way - if you find the time I'd
appreciate if you
>> could have a look at the patch:
>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attac
hment.cgi?id=21273&action=view
>
> I stripped down the patch to the (hopefully) relevant
bits (we don't
> have a host and port in our internal URLs), and it
seems to do the
> trick. Some more testing would of course be greatly
appreciated.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> -- Andreas
>
>
I think with what Jürgen and Andreas fixed and this last one
by me,
42385 might finally actually be fixed. If others could test
and confirm
that would be great. Batik's caching is completely weird and
wonky. You
shouldn't have to delve that deeply into the source to make
your code
work properly. RC6 feels like the right one to me!
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help lenya.apache.org
|