Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>
> I agree to that (in trunk) - what do the others think?
>
> Do we want to require a specific announcement mail
before changes
> which require adapting existing content or code, with a
certain
> period of delay so that others can state their
objections?
yes, because it will give people a chance to state their
opinion and also
prepare themselves to act accordingly in case such cases are
going to
happen.
As said before I am not generally against such changes, but
against the
way these things
are being handled currently
>
> -1 from me, because that would include practically all
changes at
> the moment because client code could be based on any of
our code.
I am not sure if I really understand what you mean. You mean
because
people base their
stuff on Lenya? Well, sure they do. This is why API changes
need to be
communicated properly
and in the case of a stable branch the API is even frozen
except for bug
fixes.
Michi
>
> -- Andreas
>
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache
Lenya
http://www.wyona.com
http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner wyona.com michiapache.org
+41 44 272 91 61
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribelenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helplenya.apache.org
|