[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SO
LR-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:
comment-tabpanel#action_12508603 ]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-272:
------------------------------------
ok, now i'm getting the same results as you. thanks.
> SolrDocument performance testing
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-272
> URL: https:
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-272
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Test
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Attachments:
SOLR-272-SolrDocumentPerformanceTesting.patch,
SOLR-272-SolrDocumentPerformanceTesting.patch,
SolrDocumentPerformanceTester.java,
SolrDocumentPerformanceTester.java, SolrInputDoc.patch
>
>
> In 1.3, we added SolrInputDocument -- a temporary class
to hold document information. There is concern that this
may be less then ideal performance-wise.
> To settle some concerns (mine included) I want to
compare a few SolrDocument implementations to make sure we
are not doing something crazy.
> I implemented a LuceneInputDocument subclass of
SolrInputDocument that stores its values directly in Lucene
Document (rather then a Map<String,Collection>).
> This is a quick test comparing:
> 1. Building documents with SolrInputDocument
> 2. Building documents with LuceneInputDocument (same
interface writing directly to Document)
> 3. using DocumentBuilder (solr 1.2, solr 1.1)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
online.
|
