List Info

Thread: Commented: (SOLR-139) Support updateable/modifiable documents




Commented: (SOLR-139) Support updateable/modifiable documents
country flaguser name
United States
2007-07-20 00:25:06
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SO
LR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:
comment-tabpanel#action_12514099 ] 

Mike Klaas commented on SOLR-139:
---------------------------------

It is my fault that the DUH2 locking is so hairy to begin
with, so I should at least review changes to it ;)

With your last change, the locking looks sound.  However, I
noticed a few things:

This comment is now inaccurate:
+    // need to start off with the write lock because we
can't aquire
+    // the write lock if we need to.

Should openSearcher() call closeSearcher() instead of doing
it manually?  It looks like searcherHasChanges is not being
reset to false.



> Support updateable/modifiable documents
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-139
>                 URL: https:
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: update
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Assignee: Ryan McKinley
>         Attachments: getStoredFields.patch,
getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch,
SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch,
SOLR-139-XmlUpdater.patch,
SOLR-269+139-ModifiableDocumentUpdateProcessor.patch
>
>
> It would be nice to be able to update some fields on a
document without having to insert the entire document.
> Given the way lucene is structured, (for now) one can
only modify stored fields.
> While we are at it, we can support incrementing an
existing value - I think this only makes sense for numbers.
> for background, see:
> http://www.nabble.com/loading-many-doc
uments-by-ID-tf3145666.html#a8722293

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
online.


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )