Re: Master/Slave and Primary/Secondary

BIKESHED.

STU


-----ORIGINAL MESSAGE-----
FROM: MIKE KLAAS <MIKE.KLAASGMAIL.COM>
SENT: FRI, JULY 27, 2007 2:10 PM
TO: SOLR-DEVLUCENE.APACHE.ORG
SUBJECT: RE: MASTER/SLAVE AND PRIMARY/SECONDARY

ON 26-JUL-07, AT 6:54 PM, SUNDLING, PAUL WROTE:

> WHEN I STARTED COMPUTING IT WAS ALWAYS MASTER AND
SLAVE.  IN THE LAST
> SEVERAL YEARS I'VE SEEN PEOPLE USE PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY INSTEAD.   
> WHEN
> I SAW THE OLD STYLE I LOOKED IT UP AND THIS IS WHAT I
FOUND:
>
>
HTTP://EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG/WIKI/MASTER-SLAVE_%28COMPUTERS%29
>
>
HTTP://WWW.TECHSPOT.COM/NEWS/9129-MASTER-AND-SLAVE-COMPUTER-
LABELS- 
> UNACC
> EPTABLE.HTML
>
>
HTTP://WWW.SMH.COM.AU/ARTICLES/2003/11/26/1069825847240.HTML
>
> IS IT WAS WORTH CHANGING THE TERMINOLOGY FROM
MASTER/SLAVE TO
> PRIMARY/SECONDARY?

-

-MIKE