Re: svn commit: r573296 - /lucene/solr/trunk/client/ruby/solr-ruby/CHANGES.yml

: Log:
: Fix YAML parsing issue

Erik: Are you reading perl blogs now or did someone email
you about this?

(you seem to have single handedly started a movement)
h
ttp://use.perl.org/articles/07/09/06/0324215.shtml


-Hoss

On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:

>
> : Log:
> : Fix YAML parsing issue
>
> Erik: Are you reading perl blogs now or did someone
email you about  
> this?
>
> (you seem to have single handedly started a movement)
> h
ttp://use.perl.org/articles/07/09/06/0324215.shtml

I got alerted through my aggregator somehow of this:

   http://bricas.vox.com/library/post/changesyml-spec.html

and the same guy posted it over to the link you sent which
he shared  
with me in #code4lib earlier today.  So no, not reading Perl
blogs, I  
got much sharper sticks I'd rather stick in my eye!  But I
did  
stumble on that one today and indeed I had gotten lax and
screwed up  
the data structure it parsed to.  Now its a clean Ruby Hash
like this:

$ jirb
irb(main):001:0> require 'yaml'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> 
YAML.load_file('/Users/erik/dev/solr/client/ruby/ 
solr-ruby/CHANGES.yml')
=>
{"v0.0.2"=>{"changes"=>["mapp
ers, etc"], "release_date"=>#<Date:  
4908471/2,0,2299161>},
"v0.0.3"=>{"changes"=>["Adjus
ted HpricotMapper  
and XPathMapper, and tests, to load only if their
dependencies are  
available."], "release_date"=>#<Date:
4908485/2,0,2299161>},  
"v0.0.4"=>{"changes"=>["Solr:
:Indexer#solr added to gain access to  
the Solr::Connection instance", "Fixed issue with
multi-line String  
field values when field set
multiValued="false"", "Fixed tests to 

work without either Hpricot or libxml2"],
"release_date"=>#<Date:  
4908657/2,0,2299161>},
"v0.0.5"=>{"changes"=>["Added
support for  
highlighter fragment size to Solr::Request::Standard",
"Added support  
for MoreLikeThese to Solr::Request::Standard",
"Added  
Solr::Request::ModifyDocument (requires SOLR-139
patch)", "Added  
Solr::Util.query_parser_escape()"],
"release_date"=>"2007-08-??"},  
"v0.0.1"=>{"changes"=>["initi
al release"], "release_date"=>#<Date: 

4908293/2,0,2299161>}}

Kinda cute, but not worth starting a revolution about. 
Structure is  
overrated.

	Erik