compareToValidator promotion

It's certainly stable enough at this point.
However, I've never gotten around to localizing the messages
or operator names.
There should probably be some unit tests as well.
It's probably not enough to hold it back from being
promoted, though.

Perhaps you can start a vote on promotion on devmyfaces,
and open a
JIRA issue and submit some patches to move it into
Tomahawk.

On 8/30/07, Martin Denham <mjdenhamgmail.com> wrote:
> I have used the compareToValidator in a couple of
applications and have
> found it to be very useful.  The only issue is that it
is not in the main
> tomahawk jar.
>
> Are there plans to move compareToValidator to the
Tomahawk jar?
>
> Thanks
>
> Martin
>

Hi,

can we move this one and some others to the long discussed
myfaces-jsf-commons
(or how it should be named) subproject?

If there is nothing tomahawk related in this validator i
like to use
it without tomahawk.jar in the classpath.


Regards,
    Volker

2007/8/30, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenbgmail.com>:
> It's certainly stable enough at this point.
> However, I've never gotten around to localizing the
messages or operator names.
> There should probably be some unit tests as well.
> It's probably not enough to hold it back from being
promoted, though.
>
> Perhaps you can start a vote on promotion on devmyfaces,
and open a
> JIRA issue and submit some patches to move it into
Tomahawk.
>
> On 8/30/07, Martin Denham <mjdenhamgmail.com> wrote:
> > I have used the compareToValidator in a couple of
applications and have
> > found it to be very useful.  The only issue is
that it is not in the main
> > tomahawk jar.
> >
> > Are there plans to move compareToValidator to the
Tomahawk jar?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Martin
> >
>

I would love to do so.   However, I have no idea how to
configure a
new subproject in maven (or svn for that matter).

If someone puts together the infrastructure, I'll help move
over the
validators, converters, and other components that fit the
criteria.

On 8/30/07, Volker Weber <v.weberinexso.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can we move this one and some others to the long
discussed myfaces-jsf-commons
> (or how it should be named) subproject?
>
> If there is nothing tomahawk related in this validator
i like to use
> it without tomahawk.jar in the classpath.
>
>
> Regards,
>     Volker
>
> 2007/8/30, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenbgmail.com>:
> > It's certainly stable enough at this point.
> > However, I've never gotten around to localizing
the messages or operator names.
> > There should probably be some unit tests as well.
> > It's probably not enough to hold it back from
being promoted, though.
> >
> > Perhaps you can start a vote on promotion on
devmyfaces, and open a
> > JIRA issue and submit some patches to move it into
Tomahawk.
> >
> > On 8/30/07, Martin Denham <mjdenhamgmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have used the compareToValidator in a
couple of applications and have
> > > found it to be very useful.  The only issue
is that it is not in the main
> > > tomahawk jar.
> > >
> > > Are there plans to move compareToValidator to
the Tomahawk jar?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> >
>