|
List Info
Thread: Antwort: Re: General question: development 1.0.x vs. 1.2.x
|
|
| Antwort: Re: General question:
development 1.0.x vs. 1.2.x |
 
Germany |
2007-08-31 02:48:05 |
|
Hi,
Sorry but it does not seem to be so
clear to me how to get/make a fresh build of the 1.2.x branch.
I looked into the repositories but only
discovered the 1.0.x branch plus the rather older 1.2.x snapshots.
It might be a good idea to briefly describe
the steps to build oneself a fresh 1.2.x release e.g. in the wiki.
Or, if you do not mind, please just
point out the main steps here in the mailing list, many thanks!
Best,
Wolfgang.
"Matthias Wessendorf"
<;matzew apache.org>
Gesendet von: mwessendorfgmail.com
28.08.2007 10:51
Bitte antworten an
";MyFaces Discussion" <usersmyfaces.apache.org>; |
|
An
| "MyFaces Discussion" <usersmyfaces.apache.org>;
|
|
Kopie
|
|
Thema
| Re: [Trinidad] General question: development
1.0.x vs. 1.2.x | |
| |
Hi,
yes. Trinidad 1.0.x is designed to work in a JSF 1.1 environment and
Trinidad 1.2.x is the "JSF 1.2" counterpart.
The main development (like fixing bugs) goes to trunk (Trinidad 1.0.x).
Time by time, we (Adam) creates a special 1.2.x branches to get the
latest/greates 1.0.x features to be available in Trinidad 1.2.x as
well.
JSF 1.2 specific bugs, for instance, will be fixed directly on the
particular Trinidad 1.2.x branch.
HTH,
Matthias
On 8/28/07, wolfgang.toepferpta.de <wolfgang.toepferpta.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Trinidad and have a general question regarding the Trinidad
> development process:
>
>; Development seems to be done for two versions: 1.0.x and 1.2.x.
>
> I suppose the development going on for 1.0.x is only done for downward
> compatibility regarding JSF 1.1.
>; So the 1.2.x versions already have all the stuff working where in
1.0.x
> there is still work being done.
>
> Is my understanding correct?
>
>; Thanks for clarifying!
>
> Best,
> Wolfgang.
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
|
| Re: Re: General question: development
1.0.x vs. 1.2.x |
|
2007-08-31 02:56:00 |
|
ok, the main focus for dev is trunk (1.0.x)
time by time (that can be every 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 3 month,...) a 1.2.x branch is created.
trunk is 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT there is NO ! 1.2.3-SNAP yet!
the latest JSF
1.2.x branch is the 1.2.2-branch.
That will be released next week (I'll provide the RC over the weekend)
HTH,
Matthias
On 8/31/07, wolfgang.toepferpta.de">
wolfgang.toepferpta.de < wolfgang.toepferpta.de">wolfgang.toepferpta.de>; wrote:
Hi,
Sorry but it does not seem to be so
clear to me how to get/make a fresh build of the 1.2.x branch.
I looked into the repositories but only
discovered the 1.0.x branch plus the rather older 1.2.x snapshots.
It might be a good idea to briefly describe
the steps to build oneself a fresh 1.2.x release e.g. in the wiki.
Or, if you do not mind, please just
point out the main steps here in the mailing list, many thanks!
Best,
Wolfgang.
Hi,
yes. Trinidad 1.0.x is designed to work in a JSF 1.1 environment and
Trinidad 1.2.x is the "JSF 1.2" counterpart.
The main development (like fixing bugs) goes to trunk (Trinidad 1.0.x).
Time by time, we (Adam) creates a special 1.2.x branches to get the
latest/greates 1.0.x features to be available in Trinidad 1.2.x as
well.
JSF 1.2 specific bugs, for instance, will be fixed directly on the
particular Trinidad 1.2.x branch.
HTH,
Matthias
On 8/28/07, wolfgang.toepferpta.de" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">wolfgang.toepferpta.de < wolfgang.toepferpta.de" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
wolfgang.toepferpta.de>; wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Trinidad and have a general question regarding the Trinidad
> development process:
>
>; Development seems to be done for two versions: 1.0.x and 1.2.x.
>
> I suppose the development going on for 1.0.x is only done for downward
> compatibility regarding JSF 1.1.
>; So the 1.2.x versions already have all the stuff working where in
1.0.x
> there is still work being done.
>
> Is my understanding correct?
>
>; Thanks for clarifying!
>
> Best,
> Wolfgang.
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
|
[1-2]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|