List Info

Thread: Re: Intercepting the request




Re: Intercepting the request
country flaguser name
United States
2007-09-24 11:55:38
that means, It would go to the backed bean and then I set a variable and come back to the same page...

Luka Surija <luka.surijaiytim.hr&gt; wrote:


...your input page data


...your Audit page data


Sushma Sharma wrote:
>; how do I show a section in the same view after the data has been
> validated?
>
> */David Delbecq OMA.BE>/* wrote:
>;
> If the problem is only that you do not want to display the log
> field at
> same time, you can put the log field entry in a section that is only
> "rendered" after data are validated. It's still the same "view"
>; but user
> now only see the log fields.
&gt;
>
>; Another possibility, with one page for each data set but only one
> log page
>
> page1: fill data change
>; page 1 action : store in session bean a "request for change objet"
>; (can
> even be your action bean itself :p)
> navigate to logEntry
&gt; logEntry: fill log informaton
> logEntry action: store log informations, execute the "request for
> change" object you stored
>;
> If you want to intercept various steps of JSF lifecycle, this can be
> done with a phase listener. However,while phase listener can be
> great as
> a monitoring tool or to handle special query parameter as
> initialisation
> stuff for beans, it can become a mess if you use it to delay actions.
&gt;
> Sushma Sharma a écrit :
> > My pages are already really big, so I do not want to add audit
> fields
>; > also in the same page. I have one page where I have included audit
> > fields also and I am being asked to do it the other way. So, I
> wanted
>; > to find a standard way to capture the audit info as I am going
> to need
> > it for other pages also.
> >
> > */David Delbecq /* wrote:
>; >
> > Why don't you put the 'audit log' fields in page1, along with
> > datas they
> > change. It's not mandatory, in JSF, that the same bean be used for
> > all
> > component in form. You can update and gather datas from various
&gt; > beans /
> > various request scope in a single form. That way you do all in a
> > single
>; > move.
> > Sushma Sharma a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have many jsf pages(page1, page2, page 3, page4) where users can
> > > make changes, but before they can submit/save the changes, I
> > have to
> > > take them to audit log page, where they have to enter the
> remedy id
> > > and description of the changes. Currently what I am doing is I am
> > > several pages(auditpage1, auditpage2, auditpage3 etc..) for the
> > audit
> > > log and from each page(page1) I take the users to corresponding
> > audit
> > > page(auditpage1) and in this audt page I specify the actual bean
> > > action to save the changes.
&gt; > > Is it possible that I specify actual action methods in page1and on
> > > clicking the commandButton/link, I intercept the request and
> > take then
> > > to a single audit log and after user enters the details and clicks
>; > > another button, resume the action clicked on the page1.
>; > > let me know if it is possible and how to do it? If there is any
> > other
> > > better way to do it, please suggest.
&gt; > > Thanks,
&gt; > >
> > >
> > > The word "Impossible" itself says " I m possible".
> > > */Sushma/**//*
> > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>; > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers
&gt; > > from
> > > someone who knows.
>; > > Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The word "Impossible" itself says " I m possible".
> > */Sushma/**//*
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>; > Got a little couch potato?
&gt; > Check out fun summer activities for kids.
> >
>
>
>
&gt;
> The word "Impossible" itself says " I m possible".
> */Sushma/**//*
>
&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>; Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
>; Check out fitting gifts for grads
>
> at Yahoo! Search.




The word "Impossible" itself says " I m possible".
Sushma

&#32;


Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on Yahoo! TV.
Re: Intercepting the request
user name
2007-09-24 16:15:54
Yes, and If you use any ajax technology than you don't have
to do full 
round-trip.

Sushma Sharma wrote:
> that means, It would go to the backed bean and then I
set a variable 
> and come back to the same page...
>
> */Luka Surija <luka.surijaiytim.hr>/* wrote:
>
>
>
>     ...your input page data
>
>
>     ...your Audit page data
>
>
>     Sushma Sharma wrote:
>     > how do I show a section in the same view after
the data has been
>     > validated?
>     >
>     > */David Delbecq /* wrote:
>     >
>     > If the problem is only that you do not want to
display the log
>     > field at
>     > same time, you can put the log field entry in
a section that is only
>     > "rendered" after data are validated.
It's still the same "view"
>     > but user
>     > now only see the log fields.
>     >
>     >
>     > Another possibility, with one page for each
data set but only one
>     > log page
>     >
>     > page1: fill data change
>     > page 1 action : store in session bean a
"request for change objet"
>     > (can
>     > even be your action bean itself :p)
>     > navigate to logEntry
>     > logEntry: fill log informaton
>     > logEntry action: store log informations,
execute the "request for
>     > change" object you stored
>     >
>     > If you want to intercept various steps of JSF
lifecycle, this can be
>     > done with a phase listener. However,while
phase listener can be
>     > great as
>     > a monitoring tool or to handle special query
parameter as
>     > initialisation
>     > stuff for beans, it can become a mess if you
use it to delay
>     actions.
>     >
>     > Sushma Sharma a écrit :
>     > > My pages are already really big, so I do
not want to add audit
>     > fields
>     > > also in the same page. I have one page
where I have included audit
>     > > fields also and I am being asked to do it
the other way. So, I
>     > wanted
>     > > to find a standard way to capture the
audit info as I am going
>     > to need
>     > > it for other pages also.
>     > >
>     > > */David Delbecq /* wrote:
>     > >
>     > > Why don't you put the 'audit log' fields
in page1, along with
>     > > datas they
>     > > change. It's not mandatory, in JSF, that
the same bean be used for
>     > > all
>     > > component in form. You can update and
gather datas from various
>     > > beans /
>     > > various request scope in a single form.
That way you do all in a
>     > > single
>     > > move.
>     > > Sushma Sharma a écrit :
>     > > > Hi,
>     > > >
>     > > > I have many jsf pages(page1, page2,
page 3, page4) where
>     users can
>     > > > make changes, but before they can
submit/save the changes, I
>     > > have to
>     > > > take them to audit log page, where
they have to enter the
>     > remedy id
>     > > > and description of the changes.
Currently what I am doing is
>     I am
>     > > > several pages(auditpage1,
auditpage2, auditpage3 etc..) for the
>     > > audit
>     > > > log and from each page(page1) I take
the users to corresponding
>     > > audit
>     > > > page(auditpage1) and in this audt
page I specify the actual bean
>     > > > action to save the changes.
>     > > > Is it possible that I specify actual
action methods in
>     page1and on
>     > > > clicking the commandButton/link, I
intercept the request and
>     > > take then
>     > > > to a single audit log and after user
enters the details and
>     clicks
>     > > > another button, resume the action
clicked on the page1.
>     > > > let me know if it is possible and
how to do it? If there is any
>     > > other
>     > > > better way to do it, please
suggest.
>     > > > Thanks,
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > > The word "Impossible"
itself says " I m possible".
>     > > > */Sushma/**//*
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>    
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>     > > > Be a better Heartthrob. Get better
relationship answers
>     > > > from
>     > > > someone who knows.
>     > > > Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > The word "Impossible" itself
says " I m possible".
>     > > */Sushma/**//*
>     > >
>     > >
>     >
>    
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>     > > Got a little couch potato?
>     > > Check out fun summer activities for
kids.
>     > >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > The word "Impossible" itself says
" I m possible".
>     > */Sushma/**//*
>     >
>     >
>    
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>     > Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
>     > Check out fitting gifts for grads
>     >
>     > at Yahoo! Search.
>
>
>
>
> The word "Impossible" itself says " I m
possible".
> */Sushma/**//*
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
> Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight?
Preview the hottest 
> shows 
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.co
m/tv/mail/tagline/tonightspicks/evt=48220/*http://tv.yahoo.c
om/%20> 
> on Yahoo! TV. 


[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )