VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1

I just uploaded 3.1 RC5 and I think it's ready for release.

Please take a look at the release files, do a sanity test or
two if
you have time and VOTE!


Release files and updated docs are here:
http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/


List of isues fixed so far in RCs is here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/R
OLLER/Testing+Roller+3.1


Thanks,
Dave

Hi Dave,

I downloaded and verified signatures for the .tar.gz and
.zip files.  
Look good.

Just one comment on the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. You have
several  
attributions of code but you don't include the licensing
terms for  
them, except for JDOM, Blojsom and Pebble.

So I didn't see what license terms apply to ROME, Acegi
Security, and  
icons by Mark James.

Did you run RAT on the release?

Craig

On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:07 PM, Dave wrote:

> I just uploaded 3.1 RC5 and I think it's ready for
release.
>
> Please take a look at the release files, do a sanity
test or two if
> you have time and VOTE!
>
>
> Release files and updated docs are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/

>
> List of isues fixed so far in RCs is here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/R
OLLER/Testing+Roller+3.1
>
>
> Thanks,
> Dave

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/
products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russellsun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

On 3/12/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russellsun.com> wrote:
> I downloaded and verified signatures for the .tar.gz
and .zip files.
> Look good.
>
> Just one comment on the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. You
have several
> attributions of code but you don't include the
licensing terms for
> them, except for JDOM, Blojsom and Pebble.
>
> So I didn't see what license terms apply to ROME, Acegi
Security, and
> icons by Mark James.

Thanks Craig.


> Did you run RAT on the release?

What's RAT?


- Dave

I haven't run RAT myself. Perhaps Robert could give us a
pointer.

Craig

On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Dave wrote:

> On 3/12/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russellsun.com> wrote:
>> I downloaded and verified signatures for the
.tar.gz and .zip files.
>> Look good.
>>
>> Just one comment on the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt.
You have several
>> attributions of code but you don't include the
licensing terms for
>> them, except for JDOM, Blojsom and Pebble.
>>
>> So I didn't see what license terms apply to ROME,
Acegi Security, and
>> icons by Mark James.
>
> Thanks Craig.
>
>
>> Did you run RAT on the release?
>
> What's RAT?
>
>
> - Dave

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/
products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russellsun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

So, RAT is the Release Audit Tool that Robert wrote. Let's
see what  
we can do without Robert's help first.

Take a look at

http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&
;rls=en&q=apache 
+RAT&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
http://c
ode.google.com/p/arat/downloads/list
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/fileupload/rat-rep
ort.html

I've downloaded it and I'll take a look at how easy it is to
use in  
the next 5 minutes.

Craig

On Mar 12, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:

> I haven't run RAT myself. Perhaps Robert could give us
a pointer.
>
> Craig
>
> On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>> On 3/12/07, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russellsun.com> wrote:
>>> I downloaded and verified signatures for the
.tar.gz and .zip files.
>>> Look good.
>>>
>>> Just one comment on the LICENSE.txt and
NOTICE.txt. You have several
>>> attributions of code but you don't include the
licensing terms for
>>> them, except for JDOM, Blojsom and Pebble.
>>>
>>> So I didn't see what license terms apply to
ROME, Acegi Security,  
>>> and
>>> icons by Mark James.
>>
>> Thanks Craig.
>>
>>
>>> Did you run RAT on the release?
>>
>> What's RAT?
>>
>>
>> - Dave
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/
products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russellsun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/
products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russellsun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Hmm.  I'm still finding only RC4 up there.  What am I doing
wrong?

--a.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave" <snoopdavegmail.com>
To: <roller-devincubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1


>I just uploaded 3.1 RC5 and I think it's ready for
release.
> 
> Please take a look at the release files, do a sanity
test or two if
> you have time and VOTE!
> 
> 
> Release files and updated docs are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-3.1/

> 
> List of isues fixed so far in RCs is here:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/R
OLLER/Testing+Roller+3.1
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
>

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anil Gangolli" <anilbusybuddha.org>
> Subject: Re: Release Apache Roller 3.1
> >
> > Hmm.  I'm still finding only RC4 up there.  What
am I doing wrong?
>
On 3/13/07, Anil Gangolli <anilbusybuddha.org> wrote:
> Dave, I found it sitting in the wrong directory
(apache-roller-2.3.1).

Doh!

Everything should be in the right place now.

- Dave

I will have a chance tomorrow.

--a.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave" <snoopdavegmail.com>
To: <roller-devincubator.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: VOTE: Release Apache Roller 3.1


> VOTES so far:
>
> Matt +1
>
> Anybody have a chance to take a look at the build?
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <mattraibledesigns.com>
wrote:
>> I just noticed I have the following at the bottom
of my page - where
>> my weblog form should be:
>>
>>
#showWeblogEntryCommentForm(org.apache.roller.pojos.wrapper.
WeblogEntryDataWrapperf12760)
>>
>> No worries though, this is probably something from
my customized
>> theme, so here's my vote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On 3/14/07, Dave <snoopdavegmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <mattraibledesigns.com> wrote:
>> > > On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland
<allen.gillilandsun.com> wrote:
>> > > > I thought I had fixed that in the
trunk a while ago, but in any 
>> > > > case I
>> > > > don't know that little things like
this are big enough to keep 
>> > > > causing
>> > > > us to delay the release.  At some
point we have to accept the fact 
>> > > > that
>> > > > we can't fix everything in one
release and just move on.
>> >
>> > I totally agree with that sentiment. I thought
the broken create
>> > directory feature was bad enough to warrant a
fix. A moment of
>> > weakness perhaps 
>> >
>> > Let's see some votes so we can get this thing
out.
>> >
>> > - Dave
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://raibledesigns.com

>>
> 

After enough self-wrestling, it works (bad week). +1

-Elias

Dave wrote:
> VOTES so far:
> 
> Matt +1
> 
> Anybody have a chance to take a look at the build?
> 
> - Dave
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <mattraibledesigns.com>
wrote:
>> I just noticed I have the following at the bottom
of my page - where
>> my weblog form should be:
>>
>>
#showWeblogEntryCommentForm(org.apache.roller.pojos.wrapper.
WeblogEntryDataWrapperf12760)
>>
>>
>> No worries though, this is probably something from
my customized
>> theme, so here's my vote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On 3/14/07, Dave <snoopdavegmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 3/14/07, Matt Raible <mattraibledesigns.com> wrote:
>> > > On 3/14/07, Allen Gilliland
<allen.gillilandsun.com> wrote:
>> > > > I thought I had fixed that in the
trunk a while ago, but in any
>> case I
>> > > > don't know that little things like
this are big enough to keep
>> causing
>> > > > us to delay the release.  At some
point we have to accept the
>> fact that
>> > > > we can't fix everything in one
release and just move on.
>> >
>> > I totally agree with that sentiment. I thought
the broken create
>> > directory feature was bad enough to warrant a
fix. A moment of
>> > weakness perhaps 
>> >
>> > Let's see some votes so we can get this thing
out.
>> >
>> > - Dave
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> http://raibledesigns.com

>>
>