Ahmet Emre wrote:
>
> We are starting to use some web services first time in
our company.
> There were few web service calls we had developed in
the past and we
> were using WSIF. Now we do expect more and more web
service calls
> being made and we do expect web services becoming an
important part of
> the architecture in a year or so.
>
> How do you guys see WSIF in the future? In order to
invoke Web
> Services do you believe WSIF is the way to go? Or would
you say WSIF
> is legacy and focus on something else? As I researched
little bit,
> WSIF community is not very active anymore.
yes that is correct but the level of activity is depending
on
contribution of anybody interested (and if there are many
open issues
worked on which is not the case nowadays).
i think WSIF has many strong points and it provides an
excellent level
of abstraction of "service" by using WSDL and it
should stay around for
long time
from my side i posted release candidates but i did not get
much of
feedback - if the latest RC is good we may vote to have it
released as
official new version of WSIF
as of future i would like to see AXIS2 provider added/tested
to WSIF and
maybe make a new version with the same API but some
improvements, such
as adding support for WSDL2, better and more flexible
XML-Java data
binding/mapping, and more async with WS-Addressing, and
anything that
is people find useful and time to contribute ;)
best,
Alek
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsif-user-unsubscribe ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: wsif-user-help ws.apache.org
|