|
List Info
Thread: RE: What is the current status of WSIF
|
|
| RE: What is the current status of WSIF |
 
United States |
2007-06-12 12:10:35 |
|
HI all
Just a quick opinion.
We have been using WSIF for some web service and lots of POJO bound
invocations. It works well…; Things have gone pretty well. ; I’d
love to see WSIF move up to a newer WSDL4J parser.
He have found a few thread sync problems
in WSIF and have been able to work around those.
HOWEVER, we have found that IBM WebSphere runtime
jar ALSO includes a very different version of WSIF. The IBM version has horrible
performance and lots of thread synchronization problems. This has caused us no end
of pain. In WebSphere, you cannot work the class path to use Apache WSIF.
Therefore, if you plan to use WSIF in
WebSphere, I believe you will have problems. However, if you use it anywhere
else, I believe you will find it to be a pleasant experience.
Thanks
From: sambit kumar
dikshit [mailto:sambit.dikshit apple.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:57
AM
To: wsif-userws.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the current
status of WSIF
Hi Ahmet,
I could see the future is bright. We have been using it
for a while and successfully built a service invocation framework using WSIF
and extending some of the features. It is a really good stuff where you want to
invoke various types of services running on different protocol e.g http, soap,
jms, POJO, EJB etc.
On Jun 12, 2007, at 7:40 AM, Ahmet Emre wrote:
We are starting to use some web services first time in
our company. There were few web service calls we had developed in the
past and we were using WSIF. Now we do expect more and more web service calls
being made and we do expect web services becoming an important part of the
architecture in a year or so.
How
do you guys see WSIF in the future? In order to invoke Web Services do you
believe WSIF is the way to go? Or would you say WSIF is legacy and focus on
something else? As I researched little bit, WSIF community is not very active
anymore. There are many other things going on and it looks like Service
Component Artchitecture (SCA) and some Eclipse Web Tools Platform (WTP) are the
ones to consider first.
Thanks
for sharing your experience and thoughts on this subject.
The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information of Chordiant Software or its customers and is intended only for use to the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer. |
| RE: What is the current status of WSIF |
United States |
2007-06-12 15:33:23 |
|
Hi!
We are using WSIF on Websphere, and are
not aware of any problems – can you
elaborate on which version you are seeing
these problems?
-Doug.
From: Todd Eisemann
[mailto:Todd.Eisemannchordiant.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:11 PM
To: wsif-userws.apache.org
Subject: RE: What is the current
status of WSIF
HI all
Just a quick opinion.
We have been using WSIF for some web service and lots of POJO bound
invocations. It works well…; Things have gone pretty well. ;
I’d love to see WSIF move up to a newer WSDL4J parser.
He have found a few thread sync problems in
WSIF and have been able to work around those.
HOWEVER, we have found that IBM WebSphere
runtime jar ALSO includes a very different version of WSIF. The IBM version has
horrible performance and lots of thread synchronization problems. This has
caused us no end of pain. In WebSphere, you cannot work the class path to
use Apache WSIF.
Therefore, if you plan to use WSIF in
WebSphere, I believe you will have problems. However, if you use it anywhere
else, I believe you will find it to be a pleasant experience.
Thanks
From: sambit kumar
dikshit [mailto:sambit.dikshitapple.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:57 AM
To: wsif-userws.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the current
status of WSIF
Hi Ahmet,
I could see the future is bright. We have been using it
for a while and successfully built a service invocation framework using WSIF
and extending some of the features. It is a really good stuff where you want to
invoke various types of services running on different protocol e.g http, soap,
jms, POJO, EJB etc.
On Jun 12, 2007, at 7:40 AM, Ahmet Emre wrote:
We are starting to use some web services first time in our company.
There were few web service calls we had developed in the past and we were
using WSIF. Now we do expect more and more web service calls being made and we
do expect web services becoming an important part of the architecture in a year
or so.
How do
you guys see WSIF in the future? In order to invoke Web Services do you believe
WSIF is the way to go? Or would you say WSIF is legacy and focus on something
else? As I researched little bit, WSIF community is not very active anymore.
There are many other things going on and it looks like Service Component
Artchitecture (SCA) and some Eclipse Web Tools Platform (WTP) are the ones to
consider first.
Thanks
for sharing your experience and thoughts on this subject.
The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information
of Chordiant Software or its customers and is intended only for use to the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking
of any action in reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete
the material from your computer.
|
[1-2]
|
|