DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40
862>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40862
------- Additional Comments From cam apache.org 2006-11-02
17:02 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> So the xml:base attribute is used to identify the
base URI to resolve
> relative URL's against. To be honest it is a little
unclear to me what
> should happen for a href that consists only of a
fragment identifier
> however reading section 4.2 of http://www.ietf.o
rg/rfc/rfc2396.txt
> leads me to believe that Batik's behavior is in error.
Any other
> opinions? Are we really supposed to tread just
fragment identifiers
> as a special case?
Hmm, the wording in 4.2 about "if the URI reference
occurs in a context that is
always intended to result in a new request" is a bit
dodgy, but I would guess
that paint server references aren't always intended to
result in a new request.
So since it says that if the URI reference has no URI in
it, then it's a
"same-document" reference, I agree that the
current beahviour is a bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=ema
il
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
assignee.
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribexmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-helpxmlgraphics.apache.org
|