DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38
207>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38207
a>
------- Additional Comments From x00000000 freenet.de 2007-03-28 05:46 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Your patch looks interesting but it is large enough
that I think you
> would have to provide a Contributors License Agreement
to it to be applied
> to Batik:
>
> http://www.apach
e.org/licenses/#clas
I thought about it but decided not to sign it just for this
bug (which is
just about CSS conformance and can easily be worked
around).
However, I doubt that the patches constitute "original
work"
<http:/
/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_work> (only original
work can be a
contribution as defined in the CLA), and in case they do, I
hereby release
them into the public domain. Feel free to use them or ignore
them.
I will post the latest version of my patch, but will not
continue to work
on it. It doesn't provide fully CSS conformant parsing, but
it has no known
regressions relative to the current trunk code. A better
approach than
catching scanner exceptions in the parser to ensure
forward-compatible
parsing may be to modify the scanner to emit DELIM tokens
(as defined by
the CSS "core syntax") instead of throwing
exceptions.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=ema
il
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
assignee.
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help xmlgraphics.apache.org
|