In FOP we left them be. I, too, prefer moving the branches
to a
subdirectory. After all when you delete a branch, how do you
know that a
certain branch ever existed (looking at the HEAD revision
only)? In SVN,
it's a little difficult. It's better to let them live
especially since
they don't take up additional space like with CVS. Deleting
short-lived,
unimportant branches is ok, though.
On 22.05.2006 13:34:11 thomas.deweese wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
> Cameron McCormack <cam mcc.id.au> wrote on
05/22/2006 01:48:35 AM:
>
> > Anyone know what
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/ba
tik/branches/apache/ is?
> > It looks like it has some W3C and SAX code, plus
some very old Batik
> > code. OK to delete?
>
> It's probably fine to delete (after all it can
always be recalled if
> needed for some reason). I have a slight preference
for creating an
> abandoned/dead/pruned directory to move it into but
deleting it is
> probably fine.
> Any idea what other projects do with dead branches?
Jeremias Maerki
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribexmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-helpxmlgraphics.apache.org
|