List Info

Thread: Created: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
Created: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
country flaguser name
United States		 2007-06-11 06:01:25 
Multiple definitions in glossary
--------------------------------

                 Key: FOR-1006
                 URL: https:
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
             Project: Forrest
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Plugin: input.skos
    Affects Versions: 0.8
            Reporter: Ross Gardler
            Priority: Minor


In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have
multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary
handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a
limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple
definitions.

In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions is
untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear
separately from the others.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
online.
Updated: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
country flaguser name
United States		 2007-06-11 07:52:25 
     [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atla
ssian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

SinDoc updated FOR-1006:
------------------------

    Attachment: skos-definitions.patch

SKOS shouldn't have any problem with multiple definitions
for a concept.

> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOR-1006
>                 URL: https:
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
>             Project: Forrest
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Plugin: input.skos
>    Affects Versions: 0.8
>            Reporter: Ross Gardler
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have
multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary
handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a
limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple
definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions
is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear
separately from the others.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
online.
Closed: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
country flaguser name
United States		 2007-06-11 10:38:25 
     [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atla
ssian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ross Gardler closed FOR-1006.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
      Assignee: Ross Gardler

Applied - thanks.



> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOR-1006
>                 URL: https:
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
>             Project: Forrest
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Plugin: input.skos
>    Affects Versions: 0.8
>            Reporter: Ross Gardler
>            Assignee: Ross Gardler
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have
multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary
handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a
limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple
definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions
is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear
separately from the others.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
online.
Reopened: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
country flaguser name
United States		 2007-06-11 20:08:25 
     [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atla
ssian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

David Crossley reopened FOR-1006:
---------------------------------


> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOR-1006
>                 URL: https:
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
>             Project: Forrest
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Plugin: input.skos
>    Affects Versions: 0.9-dev
>            Reporter: Ross Gardler
>            Assignee: Ross Gardler
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.9-dev
>
>         Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have
multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary
handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a
limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple
definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions
is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear
separately from the others.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
online.
Updated: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
country flaguser name
United States		 2007-06-11 20:08:26 
     [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atla
ssian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

David Crossley updated FOR-1006:
--------------------------------

    Affects Version/s:     (was: 0.8)
                       0.9-dev

> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOR-1006
>                 URL: https:
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
>             Project: Forrest
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Plugin: input.skos
>    Affects Versions: 0.9-dev
>            Reporter: Ross Gardler
>            Assignee: Ross Gardler
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.9-dev
>
>         Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have
multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary
handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a
limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple
definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions
is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear
separately from the others.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
online.
Closed: (FOR-1006) Multiple definitions in glossary
country flaguser name
United States		 2007-06-11 20:08:26 
     [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006?page=com.atla
ssian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

David Crossley closed FOR-1006.
-------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 0.9-dev

> Multiple definitions in glossary
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOR-1006
>                 URL: https:
//issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1006
>             Project: Forrest
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Plugin: input.skos
>    Affects Versions: 0.9-dev
>            Reporter: Ross Gardler
>            Assignee: Ross Gardler
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.9-dev
>
>         Attachments: skos-definitions.patch
>
>
> In the original glossary plugin it was possible to have
multiple definitions for an item. In the SKOS glossary
handling this is not currently the case. Unless this is a
limitation of the SKOS schema we should support multiple
definitions.
> In either case, the layout of the multiple definitions
is untidy at present. Each definition needs to appear
separately from the others.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
online.
[1-6]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )