Re: Conditional RequestHeader patch not reflected in documentation?

Received this query from a friend and colleague:

> ... I've been working on an issue at
> work, where we're trying to remove some headers from a
(proxied)
> request.  Whilst I was looking for a solution I came
across this
> patch:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-c
vs/200406.mbox/% 
> 3C20040606221938.13736.qmailminotaur.apache.org%3E
>
> but when I looked at the mod_headers docs -
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_headers.html
>
> I can't see anything about it.
>
> I was wondering if the patch was reversed or wasn't
used, or whether
> the documentation was behind.


Looking at the code, I'm not entirely certain if the patch
is in  
there or not. The removed lines are missing, but so are the
added  
lines. Can someone shed any light on this for me, please? Or
is this  
so long ago that it's no longer answerable?

--
http://feathercast.org/




------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribehttpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-helphttpd.apache.org

Rich Bowen wrote:
> Received this query from a friend and colleague:
>
>> ... I've been working on an issue at
>> work, where we're trying to remove some headers
from a (proxied)
>> request.  Whilst I was looking for a solution I
came across this
>> patch:
>>
>> http://mail-archives
.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-cvs/200406.mbox/%3C20040606221938
.13736.qmailminotaur.apache.org%3E 
>>
>>
>> but when I looked at the mod_headers docs -
>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_headers.html
>>
>> I can't see anything about it.
>>
>> I was wondering if the patch was reversed or wasn't
used, or whether
>> the documentation was behind.
>

Greetings,

I am the original author of the patch, which André applied.
Shortly after the patch was accepted in 2.0, I sent a
documentation 
patch for 2.0.
Reply I got was that 2.0 documentation was not important,
and doc
patch would not be applied.
As far as I know, the patch *is* applied on 2.0.


BR,

Vincent Deffontaines


>
> Looking at the code, I'm not entirely certain if the
patch is in there 
> or not. The removed lines are missing, but so are the
added lines. Can 
> someone shed any light on this for me, please? Or is
this so long ago 
> that it's no longer answerable?
>
> -- 
> http://feathercast.org/
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribehttpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docs-helphttpd.apache.org
>


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribehttpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-helphttpd.apache.org