Rocky Burt wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-10 at 20:20 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> My branch is against 1.5. Backporting shouldn't be
too hard, though
>> backporting the tests is a bit annoying since we'd
have to replicate
>> some of the CA set-up/tear-down.
>>
>> I don't have a lot of time this week, so if you're
interested in helping
>> with the backport, that'd be nice. The diffs are
basically in
>> interfaces/_event.py and associated imports in
interfaces/__init__.py,
>> in event.py (where the events are defined), in
BaseObject's
>> processForm() and in ClassGen's bad-horribly-exec'd
factory method
>> definition.
>
> Oh I misunderstood. Thought you intended on putting
this in AT 1.4 and
> 1.5 (which made me assume you would do it in 1.4
first). Unfortunately
> I have zero time these days :(
Yeah, I'd planned to, but then I realised the test framework
was a pain
to set up (no CA set-up/tear-down in the 1.4 tests), so I
copped out 
> Maybe later on I'll have time to help you backport, but
I can't promise
> anything atm :(
Yeah, I want to as well, though I guess Jensens should OK
it. I'll see
what I can do later in the week.
Martin
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys
-- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.
php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Archetypes-devel mailing list
Archetypes-devel lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/archet
ypes-devel
|