Re: Proposal for changes to static queue configuration

Jarenessto wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 10:26 -0500, Russell Bryant
wrote:
>>  If you are to the point where you have time to
implement new things, I would
>> _much_ rather that effort go toward developing a
brand new queue system for
>> Asterisk.
> 
> I wholeheartedly agree!

Took the words right out of my mouth..

I think that this is definitely worth the effort, and I'm
sure MANY people
would agree with that and provide input.

Maybe we can start a taskforce (with an obligatory humorous
photoshopped
picture of Kevin)?  (Sorry, couldn't resist)

-- 
Jason Parker
Digium

_______________________________________________

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/


--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.c
om--

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

 

> >> _much_ rather that effort go toward developing
a brand new 
> queue system for
> >> Asterisk.
> > 
> > I wholeheartedly agree!
> 
> Took the words right out of my mouth..
> 
> I think that this is definitely worth the effort, and
I'm 
> sure MANY people
> would agree with that and provide input.
> 
> Maybe we can start a taskforce (with an obligatory
humorous 
> photoshopped
> picture of Kevin)?  (Sorry, couldn't resist)
> 
> -- 
> Jason Parker
> Digium

I'm thoroughly on board with any effort to get a
next-generation
queueing system off the ground, be it input or coding (or
more likely,
both).  Definitely let me know if there is anything I can
do.

- Brad

_______________________________________________

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/


--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.c
om--

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev