Digium does not officialy support any other os then Linux.
I have talked to Mark Spencer and he says digium has no plan
to officialy
support BSD and if we want zaptel we have to port it.
Digium has been this way since I origanly ported AsteriskBSD
and got it to
build. Way back when with the help of Richard Murphy.
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 05:39, Thomas Sandford wrote:
> "Dinesh Nair" <dineshalphaque.com>
>
> > On 11/30/06 12:35 Richard said the following:
> >> asterisk-addons14 would be the way to go. and
as of now, Asterisk 1.4
> >> and libpri build fine. its just zaptel and
addons for 1.4 that dont.
> >
> > i'd be surprised if zaptel 1.4 built and worked on
freebsd, given that
> > they're linux drivers. you should be looking at
the zaptel-bsd svn and
> > porting over (very slowly and carefully) pieces
from zaptel which arent
> > there yet. i last stopped a sync with zaptel
1.2.3, and like i said, am
> > waiting for stabilization before making zaptel-bsd
1.4 ready.
>
> I've often wondered...
>
> Was there a policy reason why the BSD drivers are
developed as a separate
> project rather than trying to get Digium to roll the
BSD patches into the
> main Zaptel sources, or did it just evolve that way?
>
> Now that the BSD Zaptel is maturing, would it be worth
trying to get this
> to happen, so we don't have to play catch-up all the
time?
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
Asterisk-BSDlists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
alphaque.com>
>
> > On 11/30/06 12:35 Richard said the following:
> >> asterisk-addons14 would be the way to go. and
as of now, Asterisk 1.4
> >> and libpri build fine. its just zaptel and
addons for 1.4 that dont.
> >
> > i'd be surprised if zaptel 1.4 built and worked on
freebsd, given that
> > they're linux drivers. you should be looking at
the zaptel-bsd svn and
> > porting over (very slowly and carefully) pieces
from zaptel which arent
> > there yet. i last stopped a sync with zaptel
1.2.3, and like i said, am
> > waiting for stabilization before making zaptel-bsd
1.4 ready.
>
> I've often wondered...
>
> Was there a policy reason why the BSD drivers are
developed as a separate
> project rather than trying to get Digium to roll the
BSD patches into the
> main Zaptel sources, or did it just evolve that way?
>
> Now that the BSD Zaptel is maturing, would it be worth
trying to get this
> to happen, so we don't have to play catch-up all the
time?
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
Asterisk-BSD