On 01/30/07 06:08 Vince Vielhaber said the following:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Jerry wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>>> Ok, answering myself, branch seems to be what I
should've been building
>>> instead of trunk. With the exception of a
problem in the makefile in
>>> oct612s (it didn't know how to make install)
all went well!
>>
>>
>> Is this 1.2 or 1.4 zaptel you are building?
>
>
> 1.4
>
>> I think if you are building branch, you are
building 1.2.
>>
>> I could be wrong though, and if so I am making the
same mistake you
>> are.
>
>
> That's what threw me, I thought branch would be the
current code but *
> wouldn't compile with it. In the branches directory is
a subdirectory
> called zaptel-1.4 and all went well with that. Even
had a telemarketer
> call on it a little while ago - gonna fix that little
problem real quick!
trunk contains the working zaptel-bsd code, which not
necessarily will work
with asterisk 1.4. branches/zaptel-1.4 is the
work-in-progress leading up
to a release of zaptel-bsd which will work with asterisk
1.4.
i'm currently still in the process of porting over stuff
from zaptel 1.4 to
branches.
--
Regards, /_/ "All dogs go
to heaven."
dinesh alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.openmalay
siablog.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----============
==============+
| for a in past present future; do
|
| for b in clients employers associates relatives
neighbours pets; do |
| echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the
opinions of my $a $b." |
| done; done
|
+===========================================================
==============+
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
Asterisk-BSD lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
|