List Info

Thread: Re: upgrade path for 1.2




Re: upgrade path for 1.2
country flaguser name
Canada
2007-03-22 13:05:24
Javier Henderson wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
>> I've also been meaning to ask folks on here for
some clarity as to where
>> the work on 1.4 is happening, and if it can be
beta-tested? Perhaps I'm
>> missing something but I don't know where the
repository is for all the
>> work being done.
> What does the 1.4 port do that installing from the
tarballs doesn't?

We use ports infrastructure for tracking installations,
portaudit, and
possibly some tripwire like stuff as well I think (not sure
about that).

> I grabbed the distribution kit from digium's ftp
server, it built and
> installed right out of the box, even as far as using
BSD friendly
> directories (ie, /usr/local/etc/asterisk for config
files,
> /usr/local/share/asterisk for sound files, etc)

Good to know. In terms of installation and file system
layout, 1.4 seems
generally more BSD friendly.

cheers,

ps: BSDCan 2007 has a VoIP Tutorial session again this year


-- 
Graham Todd - bellanet.org
613.236.6163 #2443

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
Asterisk-BSDlists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd

Re: upgrade path for 1.2
country flaguser name
United States
2007-03-22 13:18:57
On Mar 22, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Graham Todd wrote:

> Javier Henderson wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Julian C. Dunn wrote:
>>> I've also been meaning to ask folks on here for
some clarity as  
>>> to where
>>> the work on 1.4 is happening, and if it can be
beta-tested?  
>>> Perhaps I'm
>>> missing something but I don't know where the
repository is for  
>>> all the
>>> work being done.
>> What does the 1.4 port do that installing from the
tarballs doesn't?
>
> We use ports infrastructure for tracking installations,
portaudit, and
> possibly some tripwire like stuff as well I think (not
sure about  
> that).

An excellent point. Thanks.

> Good to know. In terms of installation and file system
layout, 1.4  
> seems
> generally more BSD friendly.

Yes. I'm running into a weird problem with 1.4.2, where IAX2
 
registrations aren't going out for some hosts. I've two *
servers  
here, one is the "production" one (I quote that
because this is for  
use at home...) and running 1.4.0, works well. The
playground one is  
running 1.4.2, and out of four IAX2 registrations defined in
 
iax.conf, only one is sending out packets. To make matters
even more  
interesting, "iax2 show peers" shows all of the
peers as reachable.

Based on this, I'm not upgrading the 1.4.0 box until I
figured this  
one out.

-jav


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
Asterisk-BSDlists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )