Certainly an interesting problem. Without attaching
significance, I
noted that the partition types on the RAID drives were
"83" not "fd".
People on the list are correct that causes could range from
PEBKAC to
file system meta-data issues. It would be interesting to
know how long
it took to recognize this problem. Did the
directories/content switch at
once or "bleed" over a period of time?
K
Jeff Hubbs wrote:
> The drives are on a PCI-bus dual IDE controller, a
PDC20269.
>
> The salient /etc/mdadm.conf lines are:
>
> DEVICE /dev/hd[eg]1
> ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2
> UUID=35e5b25c:1052d6a0:6ce09651:4f073886
>
>
> df -k output:
>
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available
Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda3 8008132 1577980 6430152
20% /
> udev 126620 2516 124104
2% /dev
> /dev/hda4 69607468 12450124 57157344
18% /aux
> /dev/md0 157566460 108740736 40821748
73% /mnt/md0
> shm 126620 0 126620
0% /dev/shm
> /dev/cdrom 703330 703330 0
100% /mnt/cdrom
>
>
> fdisk -l output (hde and hdg are the two 160GB
drives):
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80060424192 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9733 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks
Id System
> /dev/hda1 * 1 7 56196
83 Linux
> /dev/hda2 8 70 506047+
82 Linux swap
> / Solaris
> /dev/hda3 71 1067 8008402+
83 Linux
> /dev/hda4 1068 9733 69609645
83 Linux
>
> Disk /dev/hde: 163.9 GB, 163928604672 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19929 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks
Id System
> /dev/hde1 1 19929 160079661
83 Linux
>
> Disk /dev/hdg: 163.9 GB, 163928604672 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19929 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks
Id System
> /dev/hdg1 1 19929 160079661
83 Linux
>
> Disk /dev/md0: 163.9 GB, 163921461248 bytes
> 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 40019888 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
>
> Disk /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partition
table
>
>
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 00:47 -0400, Jeff Hubbs
wrote:
>>
>>> Upon closer inspection, it appears as though
within the two directories,
>>> the directories underneath them have
"shuffled" a bit - it's not a total
>>> swap. Some from one now appear in the other
and vice versa.
>>>
>>
>> Can we get some more details about this...
>>
>> controller type
>> md0 config
>> df -k
>> fdisk -l
>>
>> Thx,
>>
>> -Jim P.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale ale.org
>> http://www.al
e.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale ale.org
> http://www.al
e.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale ale.org
http://www.al
e.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
|