jhalfs & clfs

hi,
   I added a reference to the README for ./clfs users.
...
   I am running out of ideas on what to put in the readme as
there is 
little feedback for me to write against..

  G
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Jueves, 29 de Junio de 2006 03:58, George Boudreau
escribió:
> hi,
>    I added a reference to the README for ./clfs users.
> ...
>    I am running out of ideas on what to put in the
readme as there is
> little feedback for me to write against..

Well, no time yet to do a CLFS build, thus I can't comment.

Plus, I think that with the last book changes the jhalfs
code may be broken 
due that all envars, dirs and user has been renamed from LFS
to CLFS.


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

You guys can thank someone for commenting that LFS and CLFS
can't be 
built side by side for comparisons. Hence the reason for the
change. So 
all the variables went from LFS to CLFS and to keep things
consistent we 
changed the entire book to match these changes including the
user. Also, 
is ALFS going to be ready for the 1.0.0 release in a few
weeks?

Also to give you guys a heads up, we are going to be
maintaining 3 
different books under CLFS

1.0.0 - As you see today
2.0.0 - Sysroot build of a system
3.0.0 - Embedded Systems

Right now 2.0.0 is only setup for ARM. 3.0.0 is going to
start 
developing after 1.0.0 is released, but this build will be
strictly a 
busybox uclibc system via a sysroot style build.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

On 7/2/06, Jim Gifford <lfsjg555.com> wrote:
> You guys can thank someone for commenting that LFS and
CLFS can't be
> built side by side for comparisons.

Who was that someone, if you don't mind me asking?

--
Dan
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Jim Gifford wrote:
> You guys can thank someone for commenting that LFS and
CLFS can't be 
> built side by side for comparisons. Hence the reason
for the change. So 
> all the variables went from LFS to CLFS and to keep
things consistent we 
> changed the entire book to match these changes
including the user. Also, 
> is ALFS going to be ready for the 1.0.0 release in a
few weeks?
   If you have not made too many changes it should be ready.
I have 2 
days before the missus wants to go on vacation so I will try
a fresh x86 
builds. (I had the option of going on vacation or singing
tenor in the 
Vienna Boy's Choir")
> 
> Also to give you guys a heads up, we are going to be
maintaining 3 
> different books under CLFS
> 
> 1.0.0 - As you see today
> 2.0.0 - Sysroot build of a system
> 3.0.0 - Embedded Systems
   Are the 3 books going to remain discreet documents or do
you see them 
merging into one in the future. (waaaay in the future
please)
   I have already done some preliminary work on the sysroot
book. Should 
I start thinking about CLFS-S and CLFS-E scripts for 2006.
> 
> Right now 2.0.0 is only setup for ARM. 3.0.0 is going
to start 
> developing after 1.0.0 is released, but this build will
be strictly a 
> busybox uclibc system via a sysroot style build.
> 
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/2/06, Jim Gifford <lfsjg555.com> wrote:
>> You guys can thank someone for commenting that LFS
and CLFS can't be
>> built side by side for comparisons.
>
> Who was that someone, if you don't mind me asking?
>
> -- 
> Dan
Dan,
    One person who sticks out in my mind was a guy from one
of the linux 
testing groups. He was trying to compare the different
builds to see if 
the executables were any different, which I've very
interested myself, 
I'm hoping to get the results from him so we can get before
they get 
published.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page