List Info

Thread: Optimisation in jhalfs-1.0 doing LFS-6.2




Optimisation in jhalfs-1.0 doing LFS-6.2
user name
2006-08-12 15:32:41
Hello,

I've just build a new LFS system, version 6.2.

Great great great work! Went very smoothly!

One thing only I've found:

the package db-man-2.4.3 can not handle the optimisation
I've used the
standard flags:

CFLAGS="-O3 -pipe"
etc..

adjusting the 102-man-db for this package by inserting 

unset CFLAGS
unset CXXFLAGS
etc

was enough. (I did not want to go back to the fase when the
whole makefile
and other files are created: then I had to build the whole
system over
again probably). I know that with optimisation problems may
occur, and not
considered as an error, but I'm reporting it anyway.

Futher the function 

make restart 

which I had to use works very well, only I had to unmount
the virtual
filesystems by hand. But this has been reported already.

Stef

PS I'm working on the packagemanager trip (there is a hint
about it. Very
good ! A better sollution than paco or any other LD_PRELOAD
sollution)

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Optimisation in jhalfs-1.0 doing LFS-6.2
user name
2006-08-12 15:48:12
El Sábado, 12 de Agosto de 2006 17:32, Stef Bon escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I've just build a new LFS system, version 6.2.
>
> Great great great work! Went very smoothly!

Many thanks 

> adjusting the 102-man-db for this package by inserting
>
> unset CFLAGS
> unset CXXFLAGS
> etc
>
> was enough. 

Another way is to edit the 102-man-db Makefile target to
remove the offending 
"echo export ...." lines.

> (I did not want to go back to the fase when the whole
makefile 
> and other files are created: then I had to build the
whole system over
> again probably). 

If the testige files are keeped (the empty ones with the
same name than the 
targets) the Makefile and scripts could be regenarated
without problem. The 
build should continue from the last not finished target.

> I know that with optimisation problems may occur, and
not 
> considered as an error, but I'm reporting it anyway.

Thanks. That could help other people with similar problems.


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )