./blfs-parser problems

On 2006-08-15, M.Canales.es <manuellinuxfromscratch.org>
wrote:
> El Martes, 15 de Agosto de 2006 12:17, Csaba Henk
escribió:
>> Hmm, wouldn't it be possible to have some web
fronted which supports
>> tarball generation? Then this dependency could be
get rid of...
>
> That is for the BLFS team to set up it. At this momment
there is no XML 
> tarballs availbable for the development version.

I thought svn repos are administered centrally. Isn't there
a single guy
who could be pestered with this request (with respect to all
*LFS repos)?

Csaba

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

On 8/15/06, Csaba Henk <csaba-mlcreo.hu> wrote:
> On 2006-08-15, M.Canales.es <manuellinuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> > El Martes, 15 de Agosto de 2006 12:17, Csaba Henk
escribió:
> >> Hmm, wouldn't it be possible to have some web
fronted which supports
> >> tarball generation? Then this dependency could
be get rid of...
> >
> > That is for the BLFS team to set up it. At this
momment there is no XML
> > tarballs availbable for the development version.
>
> I thought svn repos are administered centrally. Isn't
there a single guy
> who could be pestered with this request (with respect
to all *LFS repos)?

The problem right now is that the one server that this all
gets
performed on is heavily overburdened. Running xsltproc
through the
BLFS book is not a lightweight process. It takes
considerably longer
than the LFS book, but it's possible. You are talking about
the dumped
commands, correct?

On the subject. Manuel, would it be helpful for me to dump
out the
LFS-6.2 commands into
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/stable/ ?
It could be
called LFS-6.2-COMMANDS.tar.bz2 or something.

--
Dan
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Jueves, 17 de Agosto de 2006 01:33, Dan Nicholson
escribió:

> On the subject. Manuel, would it be helpful for me to
dump out the
> LFS-6.2 commands into
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/stable/ ?
It could be
> called LFS-6.2-COMMANDS.tar.bz2 or something.

Will have no sense at this moment due that jhalfs isn't
designed to generate a 
Makefile from pre-made {C,H,}LFS scripts.

Plus, scripts generation depends on several configuration
options, thus a 
separate package will need be created for each configuration
set.

And actually the OP is asking for daily snapshots of the
BLFS XML  trunk 
sources.

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

On 8/17/06, M.Canales.es <manuellinuxfromscratch.org>
wrote:
> El Jueves, 17 de Agosto de 2006 01:33, Dan Nicholson
escribió:
>
> > On the subject. Manuel, would it be helpful for me
to dump out the
> > LFS-6.2 commands into
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/stable/ ?
It could be
> > called LFS-6.2-COMMANDS.tar.bz2 or something.
>
> Will have no sense at this moment due that jhalfs
isn't designed to generate a
> Makefile from pre-made {C,H,}LFS scripts.

OK.

> And actually the OP is asking for daily snapshots of
the BLFS XML  trunk
> sources.

Hmm. Then I don't think I understand. It didn't seem like
he was
having an issue with svn. It seemed like the problem was
with
xsltproc. In that case, it wouldn't be the XML that's the
problem, but
the processing into HTML or dump-commands. Am I way off
here? Michael?

--
Dan
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Jueves, 17 de Agosto de 2006 19:37, Dan Nicholson
escribió:

> Hmm. Then I don't think I understand. It didn't seem
like he was
> having an issue with svn. It seemed like the problem
was with
> xsltproc. In that case, it wouldn't be the XML that's
the problem, but
> the processing into HTML or dump-commands. Am I way off
here? Michael?

Michael is the guy having problems with xsltproc.

That trunk XML tarball request, to avoid the SVN dependency,
come from 
Csaba 

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page