jhalfs-x; BLFS & xterm

Manuel,
   Just poking around Config.in and I noticed xterm does not
have a 
version. It seems to be called xterm2 in the xml file
(id=xterm2) and in 
the deps file.
G
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Viernes, 18 de Agosto de 2006 22:14, George Boudreau
escribió:
> Manuel,
>    Just poking around Config.in and I noticed xterm
does not have a
> version. It seems to be called xterm2 in the xml file
(id=xterm2) and in
> the deps file.

Thanks for the note. I'm revising now that version issues
trying to fix it, 
plus cleaning packages from remaining dead/obsolete
packages.

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Viernes, 18 de Agosto de 2006 22:14, George Boudreau
escribió:
> Manuel,
>    Just poking around Config.in and I noticed xterm
does not have a
> version. It seems to be called xterm2 in the xml file
(id=xterm2) and in
> the deps file.

Thinking on that version issues, maybe we should to move
get_pkg_ver() to 
func_packages to can have the data version in the packages
database and can 
reuse it in the Makefiles for the packages tracking system.

Looks right to you?

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Viernes, 18 de Agosto de 2006 22:14, George Boudreau
escribió:
>> Manuel,
>>    Just poking around Config.in and I noticed xterm
does not have a
>> version. It seems to be called xterm2 in the xml
file (id=xterm2) and in
>> the deps file.
> 
> Thinking on that version issues, maybe we should to
move get_pkg_ver() to 
> func_packages to can have the data version in the
packages database and can 
> reuse it in the Makefiles for the packages tracking
system.
> 
> Looks right to you?
   Yes.. a good idea..
> 

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page