CLFS changes..

Manuel,
   When building CLFS via bootstrap you can remove the LUSER
account and 
/cross-tools after the bootable partition has been built but
you need 
/tools to finish the build after you boot the new partition.

all:  (make a bootstrap partition)

makesys: (build the final system)
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Sábado, 16 de Septiembre de 2006 20:18, George Boudreau
escribió:
> Manuel,
>    When building CLFS via bootstrap you can remove the
LUSER account and
> /cross-tools after the bootable partition has been
built but you need
> /tools to finish the build after you boot the new
partition.

The rm command is deleting the /tools symlink in the host
root partition, not 
the /tools directory in the target partition, I think.

I'm now trying to figure how to fix the interations targets
run. Don't look 
easy at first glance :-/

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Sábado, 16 de Septiembre de 2006 20:22, M.Canales.es
escribió:

>
> I'm now trying to figure how to fix the interations
targets run. Don't look
> easy at first glance :-/

Looks that it was actually easy to do.

Starting a build now to see what happens...


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Sábado, 16 de Septiembre de 2006 21:04, M.Canales.es
escribió:

> Looks that it was actually easy to do.
>
> Starting a build now to see what happens...

The build was very good. Both the SBU-DU report and
ICA/farce analysis has 
been generated.

But I notice a new diff in the ICA/faarce results for
iteration-1 versus 
iteration-2. In iteration-2 /usr/include/bits/syscall.h has
this lines added:

#define SYS_inotify_add_watch __NR_inotify_add_watch
#define SYS_inotify_init __NR_inotify_init
#define SYS_inotify_rm_watch __NR_inotify_rm_watch

Dan, should that be reported to lfs-dev and investigated?

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page