HLFS kernel 2.4 branch..

Manuel,
   I had to add the code back which deals with HLFS
kernel-2.4 branch. 
The name does not follow the other books convention.

   G.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

El Lunes, 9 de Octubre de 2006 20:49, George Boudreau
escribió:
> Manuel,
>    I had to add the code back which deals with HLFS
kernel-2.4 branch.
> The name does not follow the other books convention.

Works fine here using the standart code.

Remenber that whe working with branches the string
"branch-" must be added to 
the beginin of the branch nane, in this case
"branch-2.4-branch" need be 
used.

Yes, looks ugry but I can't think now in other way to know
in the TREE must 
contains /branches/ or /tags/ in the path, except if we add
a STABLE 
configuration option and made the required changes in
BRANCH, BRANCH_ID, 
etc... 

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Lunes, 9 de Octubre de 2006 20:49, George Boudreau
escribió:
>> Manuel,
>>    I had to add the code back which deals with HLFS
kernel-2.4 branch.
>> The name does not follow the other books
convention.
> 
> Works fine here using the standart code.
> 
> Remenber that whe working with branches the string
"branch-" must be added to 
> the beginin of the branch nane, in this case
"branch-2.4-branch" need be 
> used.
   you are right.. it is ugly and not intuitive. Maybe we
can bug Robert 
to change the name to 2.4.
   I will change the code back.
> 
> Yes, looks ugry but I can't think now in other way to
know in the TREE must 
> contains /branches/ or /tags/ in the path, except if we
add a STABLE 
> configuration option and made the required changes in
BRANCH, BRANCH_ID, 
> etc... 
> 

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

I didn't know the combined tree, and --enable-bootstrap,
doesn't work with 
gcc-3.4. I wanted to keep it the same.

robert

On Monday 09 October 2006 14:49, George Boudreau wrote:
> Manuel,
>    I had to add the code back which deals with HLFS
kernel-2.4 branch.
> The name does not follow the other books convention.
>
>    G.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page