El Martes, 29 de Febrero de 2000 01:51, Kendrick escribió:
> I think the issue is getting a tad confused here.
Not confused at all, at least to me.
Thomas said that now, having available jhalfs, look like the
*LFS profiles for
nALFS are becoming obsolete. The answer is that yes, the is
no need to keep
updated the profiles due that jhalfs can build the base
system in a more
book-way than nALFS with not much maintenance involved.
Of course, jhalfs can't do all the tasks requested for a
full nALFS
replacement, then a new alfs tool need to be developed to
fit that requested
features.
The new alfs could to use or not jhalfs as a backend for
some tasks, like to
do by-the-book builds, but both are separate tools with
different goals.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
|