Re: problems to make glibc-2.3.6 : /tools/include/asm/errno.h:4:31: error: asm-generic/errno.h: No s

El Miércoles, 14 de Febrero de 2007 21:11, Matthew Burgess
escribió:

> Thinking about this a bit more, now that we know that
LFS needs to be built
> under bash, can we not just get rid of the workaround
of doing `make
> SHELL=/bin/bash' in jhalfs and instead just do a config
check on the host
> instead to see what the current shell is and bail out
if it's anything
> other than 'bash'?  FYI, although Ubuntu uses /bin/dash
by default,
> /bin/bash is available on a default install so it
shouldn't be hard for a
> user to get a sane environment.

Maybe, but jhalfs is used also to build HLFS and CLFSx
systems.

Moving this to alfs-discuss to allow George to can discuss
about it. 

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Miércoles, 14 de Febrero de 2007 21:11, Matthew
Burgess escribió:
> 
>> Thinking about this a bit more, now that we know
that LFS needs to be built
>> under bash, can we not just get rid of the
workaround of doing `make
>> SHELL=/bin/bash' in jhalfs and instead just do a
config check on the host
>> instead to see what the current shell is and bail
out if it's anything
>> other than 'bash'?  FYI, although Ubuntu uses
/bin/dash by default,
>> /bin/bash is available on a default install so it
shouldn't be hard for a
>> user to get a sane environment.
> 
> Maybe, but jhalfs is used also to build HLFS and CLFSx
systems.
> 
> Moving this to alfs-discuss to allow George to can
discuss about it. 
   I have not been following this thread as I thought it was
book/design 
issue as opposed to a jhalfs one.
   The current requirement is bash must exist on the system.
If jhalfs 
will build all books without a hitch then I do not see the
value in 
crashing jhalfs just because /bin/sh does not point to
bash.
   FYI the original change request to accommodate
Ubuntu/Dash was 
started by TheOldFellow on Nov.06 2006.

  ( If JHALFS-3.0 ever learns to fly it will not be using
Bash only 
C/C++ or some other high level language. )
> 

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page