List Info

Thread: Re: Questions/queries on jhalfs




Re: Questions/queries on jhalfs
country flaguser name
United States
2007-09-05 08:59:50
Kevin Williams wrote:

> I think, my first question wasn't what it was intended
to be. Certainly 
> it was my fault.
> I was trying to know, if I start jhalfs and configure
it for BLFS, would 
> it start with the
> commands from BLFS or would it start with LFS and then
proceed to BLFS ?

Well with this you can only configure one book at a time, so
you first 
configure and build LFS, then configure and build BLFS.
> 
have been
>   installed using the tool". Thus, I couldn't tell
if it only saved 
> package names
> OR tar.gz'd package OR the individual files of a
package or their names.

It only saves the package names and possibly the versions.

> 
>  >It's possible, there was a patch to add paco
support to jhalfs that was
>  >included in a few of the past versions of jhalfs,
but it wasn't being
>  >maintained by the person who created it for a
while and was eventually
>  >removed.
> 
> Yeah ! I read that ! What was discussed was about the
xsl files. Which 
> would require
> knowing xls !! I were wondering if I could simply
insert a command 
> somewhere. I guess,
> I found a way. It is not so easy and would require
editing each of the 
> scripts and changing
> the 'make install' lines. Possibly some scripting using
sed can achieve 
> this. Not sure,
> how I could do the same for those packages which, do
not include a 'make 
> install' line and
> those which, dynamically create files (convert-mans
script which 
> converts man pages for eg.).
Unfortunately that's why doing it at the xsl level works
best, then it's 
already generated and doesn't require manual editing.
> 
> Personally I feel that, package management is necessary
keeping in mind, 
> 100's if not 1000's of
> files abandoned by packages that were upgraded
somewhere along the time. 
> Without PM, it becomes really difficult to keep track
of files which are 
> no longer needed. I use paco for this. only to keep
track of installed 
> files (for clean removal).
> 

I would agree about that too, package management is almost
necessary, 
removal is one benefit, I use it more for knowing what the
heck I have 
installed on the system, especially if I want to add a new
package.

Thomas


P.S. Please send your emails in plain text so they won't
have to be 
approved every time, HTML mail is always held for moderation
due to a 
lot of spam being sent that way.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )