List Info

Thread: jhalfs-X, traces




jhalfs-X, traces
user name
2006-03-29 18:17:35
Manuel,
   statement:
    The function validate_configs is passed a parameter
which controls 
the output of the messages. Currently the user is asked to
accept/reject 
the config settings based on these traces.
   quesiton:
    It is worth the effort to remove this display option and
make it 
permanent..(minimal effort to effect this change)

   George
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
jhalfs-X, traces
user name
2006-03-29 18:19:56
El Miércoles, 29 de Marzo de 2006 20:17, George Boudreau
escribió:
> Manuel,
>    statement:
>     The function validate_configs is passed a parameter
which controls
> the output of the messages. Currently the user is asked
to accept/reject
> the config settings based on these traces.
>    quesiton:
>     It is worth the effort to remove this display
option and make it
> permanent..(minimal effort to effect this change)

I don't fully understand what do yoy meant 

Are you spooking about this?

validate_config     1 # 0/1  0-do not display values

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
jhalfs-X, traces
user name
2006-03-29 19:30:26

M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Miércoles, 29 de Marzo de 2006 20:17, George
Boudreau escribió:
>> Manuel,
>>    statement:
>>     The function validate_configs is passed a
parameter which controls
>> the output of the messages. Currently the user is
asked to accept/reject
>> the config settings based on these traces.
>>    quesiton:
>>     It is worth the effort to remove this display
option and make it
>> permanent..(minimal effort to effect this change)
> 
> I don't fully understand what do yoy meant 
> 
> Are you spooking about this?
> 
> validate_config     1 # 0/1  0-do not display values

   yes.. we always display the values, it is just extra code

   in func_validate_config.sh I could remove.

   local verbose=$1

   [[ $verbose = 1 ]] && echo ....

     with just

   echo .....
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
jhalfs-X, traces
user name
2006-03-29 19:31:44
El Miércoles, 29 de Marzo de 2006 21:30, George Boudreau
escribió:

>    yes.. we always display the values, it is just extra
code
>

Yes, I agree. The user can't accept the settings if they
are hidden 

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfroms
cratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomp
oslinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[1-4]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )