Hey Guys,
This is a very minor point, but I wanted to get your
opinions. I realize
that with all the new concepts and code that have gone into
the recent
work in the experiemental branch, there was a need to
distinguish the
new code from the original jhalfs concept. Thus we had
jhalfs-X, or
jhalfs-extended.
However, we're now merging this code back into trunk, so
I'm wondering
if it might be less confusing to just continue to refer to
it as jhalfs.
We called it extended because it reached much further than
the original
jhalfs did, but in many ways the new features were just the
natural
progression and next step...
Any thoughts or opinions?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
|