Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:33:59PM +0200, M.Canales.es
wrote:
>> El Sábado, 8 de Abril de 2006 19:14, Jeremy
Huntwork escribió:
>>
>>> However, we're now merging this code back into
trunk, so I'm wondering
>>> if it might be less confusing to just continue
to refer to it as jhalfs.
>>> We called it extended because it reached much
further than the original
>>> jhalfs did, but in many ways the new features
were just the natural
>>> progression and next step...
>> Well, I'm agnostic about what name is used to
refer to it.
>
> Like I said, it is a minor point. I just feel that
there isn't really a
> need to distinguish it from the original code,
especially as we've
> merged it to trunk, and that the -X just adds an extra
layer of
> ambiguity and/or confusion.
>
> I'll wait to hear what George (or anyone else that
wishes to comment)
> has to say first.
I have no preference either way, the -X was to separate it
from the
mainstream scripts during mailings.
> --
> JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discu
ss
FAQ: http://www.linux
fromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
|