Blojsom 3.0

Well, really stretch your mind and consider that database
tables still
reside on the filesystem. So, blojsom, indirectly uses the
filesystem as its
content database.

You still stretching?!  Good.

I believe anything is possible. In the previous releases,
there was the
Xstream (XML) backend and I had done some work with the
database. But I
think now more than in the past, the APIs have aligned above
to allow people
to do another backend implementation. And this time really
have it
switchable as in no changes to the codebase other than
changing the fetcher
class name in the Spring XML file.


On 3/24/06 4:51 AM, "Ian Forrester"
<mobileiangmail.com> wrote:

> David this sounds fantastic! Looks like Blojsom has
left the Bloxsom
> legacy once and for all now.
> 
> 
> A couple of questions,
> 
> Do you believe it will be possible to switch the
Storage layer? For
> example if someone wanted to stick with Flat files? And
in the same
> vein, do you think it would be possible to switch to
abstract storage
> like a XMLDB?
> 
> 
> Ian Forrester - Cubicgarden.com
> 
> 
> David Czarnecki wrote:
> 
>> Just in case youčre wondering about blojsom 3.0.
>> 
>> <_http://www.blojsom.com/blog/blojsom/2006/03/
23/blojsom-3-0.html_>
> 

-- 
David Czarnecki

http://www.blojsom.com/b
log/ | http://blojsom.sf.net




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking
scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend
the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new
coding territory!
http:
//sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$
1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Blojsom-users mailing list
Blojsom-userslists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blojsom-u
sers