List Info

Thread: blojsom 2-> blojsom3 upgrade utility




blojsom 2-> blojsom3 upgrade utility
user name
2006-10-12 22:38:34
I've found a few outstanding issues with blojsom 2 template
conversion.
I looked through all of the templates and these four items
stood out.

$entry.getLink() - Not converted

$entry.getBlogCategory().getCategoryURL() - Not converted

?page=comments - When in the URL, the page doesn't load

Display category name vs description logic - Category name
is always
displayed.


Ken



-----Original Message-----
From: blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On
Behalf Of
David Czarnecki
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:55 AM
To: blojsom developers
Subject: Re: [Blojsom-developers] blojsom 2-> blojsom3
upgrade utility

Got it. Thanks. 


On 10/11/06 10:48 AM, "Kenneth M. Horan"
<KHoranintelink.gov> wrote:

> Sorry about that.  It should replace lines 429 - 442 of
revision 1.16.
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of
> David Czarnecki
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:44 PM
> To: blojsom developers
> Subject: Re: [Blojsom-developers] blojsom 2->
blojsom3 upgrade utility
> 
> Although I know the general area, around what line
should this be
> inserted?
> Thanks.
> 
> Patches or diffs against the source file work really
well.
> 
> 
> On 10/10/06 6:48 PM, "Kenneth M. Horan"
<KHoranintelink.gov> wrote:
> 
>> Okay, looks easy enough to parse the parent name
from
>> BlogCategory.getEncodedCategory() instead then. 
I've finished it up
> and
>> tested it and everything seems to be working (code
attached).  Also,
>> since a new root category named "/" is
always created I've set all
>> parentless categories to use that as their parent.
>>  
>> Ken
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>> [mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf
Of
>> David Czarnecki
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 5:20 PM
>> To: blojsom developers
>> Subject: Re: [Blojsom-developers] blojsom 2->
blojsom3 upgrade
utility
>> 
>> I don't think it was ever implemented.
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/10/06 5:18 PM, "Kenneth M. Horan"
<KHoranintelink.gov> wrote:
>> 
>>> Say, was BlogCategory.getParentCategory() ever
implemented in
blojsom
>> 2?
>>> The description says:
>>> Returns the parent category of this category.
Defaults to "/"
>>> 
>>> ... but all it seems to do is return null every
time.  Am I missing
>>> something?
>>> 
>>> Ken
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>> [mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf
> Of
>>> David Czarnecki
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:56 PM
>>> To: blojsom developers
>>> Subject: Re: [Blojsom-developers] blojsom
2-> blojsom3 upgrade
> utility
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10/10/06 2:42 PM, "Kenneth M.
Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I've looked through the debug log and the
category fetching order
>>> seems
>>>> to be hierarchical.  So, assuming that's
true here's an idea for
>>> setting
>>>> the parent after line 426.
>>>> 
>>>> String parentCategoryName =
>>>>
blojsom2Category.getParentCategory().getEncodedCategory();
>>>> Category blojsom3Categories[] =
_fetcher.loadAllCategories(blog);
>>>> for (int k = 0; k <
blojsom3Categories.length; k++)
>>>> {
>>>>   if
(parentCategoryName.equals(blojsom3Categories[k].getName()))
>>>>   {
>>>> 
>>>
blojsom3Category.setParentCategoryId(blojsom3Categories[k].g
etId());
>>>>   }
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Basically, since it's safe to assume the
blojsom3 parent already
>>> exists
>>>> just grab the parent's name and loop
through all the blojsom3
>>> categories
>>>> until you find a match.  If no match is
found it has no parent, in
>>> which
>>>> case it stays null as it should be.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Ken
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>> [mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf
>> Of
>>>> David Czarnecki
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:27 PM
>>>> To: blojsom developers
>>>> Subject: Re: [Blojsom-developers] blojsom
2-> blojsom3 upgrade
>> utility
>>>> 
>>>> I probably won't delete the meta-data since
it doesn't take up that
>>> much
>>>> room and I'd rather keep it as a fallback
in case templates did
make
>>> use
>>>> of
>>>> it.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/10/06 1:08 PM, "Kenneth M.
Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov>
wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ah yes, that makes sense.  I was
thinking it might also be good to
>>>>> delete that metadata value from
blojsom2Category since it would
>>>>> effectively become duplicate data, but
I haven't found a way
delete
>> a
>>>>> metadata value from a BlogCategory.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also, does
_blojsom2Fetcher.fetchCategories() fetch them in any
>>>>> particular order?  If it follows the
file structure it should be
>>>>> possible to look up the parent's id
since it would have already
> been
>>>>> created.  Otherwise if it's random it
would probably have to be an
>>>> extra
>>>>> step since you can't assume that the
parent exists yet.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ken
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> [mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On
Behalf
>>> Of
>>>>> David Czarnecki
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:25
PM
>>>>> To: blojsom developers
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Blojsom-developers]
blojsom 2-> blojsom3 upgrade
>>> utility
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think so. But I think that first
check should have a "!" in
front
>>> of
>>>>> it
>>>>> since you want to check that the
meta-data is not null or blank.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/10/06 12:08 PM, "Kenneth M.
Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Would grabbing the category
description be as simple as making
> this
>>>>>> change at line 420?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: 
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
(org.blojsom.util.BlojsomUtils.checkNullOrBlank(blojsom2Cate
gory.getDesc
>>>>>> ription())) {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
blojsom3Category.setDescription(blojsom2Category.getEncodedC
ategory().re
>>>>>> placeAll("/", "
"));
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>
blojsom3Category.setDescription(blojsom2Category.getDescript
ion());
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To:
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
(org.blojsom.util.BlojsomUtils.checkNullOrBlank(blojsom2Cate
gory.getMeta
>>>>>> Data().get(NAME_KEY))) {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
blojsom3Category.setDescription(blojsom2Category.getMetaData
().get(NAME_
>>>>>> KEY));
>>>>>> } else if
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
(org.blojsom.util.BlojsomUtils.checkNullOrBlank(blojsom2Cate
gory.getDesc
>>>>>> ription())) {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
blojsom3Category.setDescription(blojsom2Category.getEncodedC
ategory().re
>>>>>> placeAll("/", "
"));
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>
blojsom3Category.setDescription(blojsom2Category.getDescript
ion());
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From:
blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On
> Behalf
>>>> Of
>>>>>> David Czarnecki
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006
7:37 PM
>>>>>> To: blojsom developers
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Blojsom-developers]
blojsom 2-> blojsom3 upgrade
>>>> utility
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll take a look at grabbing the
category meta-data.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 10/5/06 7:20 PM, "Kenneth
M. Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov>
> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think I found the trouble
with the categories.  The category
>>>>>>> description is being stored in
the "categorymetadata" table
> rather
>>>>>> than
>>>>>>> the "description"
column of "category".  When the description is
>>> set
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> lines 414-418 it is being set
to the name of the folder, not the
>>>>>>> descriptive name of the
category.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also, the category parent is
always being set to null on line
> 420.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The result is that all
categories have no parent, a description
>>>> equal
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> their name (excluding slashes),
and a metadata entry containing
>> the
>>>>>>> description.  I think the fact
that I named my root category "/"
>> is
>>>>>>> causing some of my link
troubles.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From:
blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On
>> Behalf
>>>>> Of
>>>>>>> David Czarnecki
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 05,
2006 6:08 PM
>>>>>>> To: blojsom developers
>>>>>>> Subject: Re:
[Blojsom-developers] blojsom 2-> blojsom3 upgrade
>>>>> utility
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 10/5/06 5:53 PM,
"Kenneth M. Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure which
properties are new, but I noticed in blojsom
> 3
>>>>>>>> there's one property added
to the default blog named
>>>>>>>>
"blog-base-admin-url" that I don't recall seeing
before.  I
>> didn't
>>>>>> see
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> way to set it via the admin
section and it wasn't added during
>> the
>>>>>>>> upgrade.  I have no idea
what it's for but I suspect everything
>>> has
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> default value when absent
so it's probably not an issue anyway.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Odd. I did another upgrade
(starting with a new DB) and the
>>> property
>>>>>> got
>>>>>>> set. The DB says:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     1   blog-base-admin-url http://localhost:8080/b
lojsom
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The upgrade utility does set
the property at line 278:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                
blog.setBlogBaseAdminURL(url);
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Not sure why it wouldn't be
there.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The problem with the
templates isn't an error, more of an
issue.
>>>>> The
>>>>>>>> themes/templates are copied
just fine and the database entries
>> are
>>>>>>> made
>>>>>>>> properly, however it's
blojsom 2 themes that are being copied
> and
>>>>>>>> blojsom 3 cannot read
blojsom 2 themes.  As a result when you
go
>>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> blog you get a screen full
of garbage.  The easiest way I saw
to
>>>> fix
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> When you say a screen full of
garbage, is it that certain data
>>>>>> elements
>>>>>>> don't display? Or is it that
the CSS doesn't display? I did just
>>>>>> notice
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> CSS thing and that may be
because certain template elements
>>> changed.
>>>>>> So,
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> can add in code to do some
regex replacement of items such as
>>>>>>> $BLOJSOM_USER
>>>>>>> to $BLOJSOM_BLOG_ID.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> that was to give everyone a
copy of the blojsom 3 asual theme.
>>> But
>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>> if not everyone is using
asual?  That's why I needed to switch
>> all
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> the "foo.vm,
text/html;charset=UTF-8" to "asual.vm,
>>>>>>>>
text/html;charset=UTF-8".  Otherwise, every single
person who
>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>> use asual will still have a
broken blog.  They can always
switch
>>>>> back
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> foo.vm after it's made
compatible with blojsom 3.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I hope that's clearer now. 
It's not really a bug, but it is an
>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>> issue that many will face.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From:
blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On
>>> Behalf
>>>>>> Of
>>>>>>>> David Czarnecki
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 05,
2006 5:28 PM
>>>>>>>> To: blojsom developers
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re:
[Blojsom-developers] blojsom 2-> blojsom3 upgrade
>>>>>> utility
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 10/5/06 5:11 PM,
"Kenneth M. Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Right now it seems to
be importing the data correctly but the
>>> data
>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> needs some processing
since it's all in the blojsom 2 format.
>>> For
>>>>>>>>> example, none of the
templates are compatible, only one
>>> permission
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> valid, and none of the
new blojsom 3 properties exist.  I was
>>> able
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> complete an upgrade
with the addition of two SQL queries and a
>>>>> short
>>>>>>>> PHP
>>>>>>>>> script.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What new blojsom 3
properties? The user preferences for the
>>>> richtext
>>>>>>>> editor
>>>>>>>> and displaying the response
text?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> * Update permissions
>>>>>>>>> UPDATE dbusermetadata
SET metadata_key = CONCAT(metadata_key,
>>>>>>>>> '_permission') WHERE
metadata_key NOT LIKE '%_permission';
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> My bad. I forgot to add
"_permission" to the end of the string.
>>>>>> That's
>>>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>>>> in CVS.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> * Reset html theme
>>>>>>>>> UPDATE template SET
template_value = 'asual.vm,
>>>>>>>> text/html;charset=UTF-8'
>>>>>>>>> WHERE template_flavor =
'html';
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I haven't been able to
reproduce this error. For example, I
have
>> a
>>>>>>>> blojsom 2
>>>>>>>> blog with the following in
its flavor.properties file:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  html=foo.vm,
text/html;charset=UTF-8
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If I look at the Template
table in the database I see:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>     1   html    foo.vm,
text/html;charset=UTF-8
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> * Give every blog a
working theme
>>>>>>>>> <?php
>>>>>>>>> $dir =
"/your/blojsom3/dir";
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> if ($dh =
opendir("$dir/WEB-INF/blogs/")) {
>>>>>>>>>     while (($file =
readdir($dh)) !== false) {
>>>>>>>>>         if ($file !=
"." && $file != ".." &&
$file !=
>>> "bootstrap")
>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> $command = "cp
>>>>>>>>>
$dir/WEB-INF/blogs/bootstrap/templates/*
>>>>> $dir/WEB-INF/blogs/$file/";
>>>>>>>>> echo $command .
"<br>n";
>>>>>>>>> `$command`;
>>>>>>>>> $command = "cp
>>>>>>>>>
$dir/WEB-INF/blogs/bootstrap/resources/*
> $dir/resources/$file/";
>>>>>>>>> echo $command .
"<br>n";
>>>>>>>>> `$command`;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>>>     closedir($dh);
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>> ?>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You might want to
mention that users will have to do the above
>>>>>>> things,
>>>>>>>>> or maybe work it into
the upgrade.  As it currently stands,
the
>>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>>> will not leave you with
a working blojsom installation.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original
Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From:
blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On
>>>> Behalf
>>>>>>> Of
>>>>>>>>> David Czarnecki
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October
05, 2006 11:12 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: blojsom developers
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re:
[Blojsom-developers] blojsom 2-> blojsom3 upgrade
>>>>>>> utility
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Great catch!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Fixed in CVS. Also
updated the upgrade utility on SourceForge.
>>> The
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>> JAR
>>>>>>>>> there contains that
fix.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 10/5/06 11:00 AM,
"Kenneth M. Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Just a quickie -
The template transfer does have an error in
>> it.
>>>>>> On
>>>>>>>>>> line 611 of
Blojsom2ToBlojsom3Utility.java, blojsom3BlogPath
> is
>>>>>>> built
>>>>>>>>>> from the location
of the blojsom2 installation, not the
>> blojsom3
>>>>>>>>>> installation.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> -----Original
Message-----
>>>>>>>>>> From:
blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On
>>>>> Behalf
>>>>>>>> Of
>>>>>>>>>> David Czarnecki
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday,
October 04, 2006 10:23 PM
>>>>>>>>>> To: blojsom
developers
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re:
[Blojsom-developers] blojsom 2-> blojsom3
upgrade
>>>>>>>> utility
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/06 2:27 PM,
"Kenneth M. Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I've put the
upgrade through a few paces and it seems to be
>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>> pretty well but
there have been a couple issues so far.
> First
>>>>> up,
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>
blojsom.properties for the blojsom-authorization-provider
>> entry
>>>>>>>> we're
>>>>>>>>>>> using
org.blojsom.authorization.LDAPAuthorizationProvider
and
>>> it
>>>>>>>> died
>>>>>>>>>>> when changing
it to
>>>>>>>>>>
org.blojsom2.authorization.LDAPAuthorizationProvider
>>>>>>>>>>> per the
instructions.  When changed to
>>>>>>>>>>>
org.blojsom2.authorization.PropertiesAuthorizationProvider
it
>>>>> ran,
>>>>>>>>>>> however it
pulls the list of blogs from blojsom-users which
> we
>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>> use.  As a
result it only upgraded one blog, "default".  It
>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll need to
generate a comma delimited list of every blog
> and
>>>>>> drop
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> into that
field.  I added a couple blogs to the list and it
>>>>> seemed
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> process them
correctly.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, in the
upgrade JAR file, it only includes the core
>>> classes.
>>>>>>>> But,
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> upgrade does assume
that all the blogs are listed out in the
>>>>>>>>>> blojsom-users
>>>>>>>>>> property.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> You could also list
each blog out on separate lines in
>>>>>>>>>> blojsom.properties
as
>>>>>>>>>> in:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> blojsom-users=blog1
>>>>>>>>>> blojsom-users=blog2
>>>>>>>>>> blojsom-users=blog3
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> There's also a
problem with themes.  After processing, the
>>> blogs
>>>>>>>>>>> directory is
still empty so there's no templates for the
> blogs
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> load.
>>>>>>>>>>> A new directory
was not created for the new blogs.  Also
> since
>>>>>>>>> there's
>>>>>>>>>>> currently only
one theme, any blog that wasn't using asual
>> will
>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> load
>>>>>>>>>>> since its html
theme setting is preserved.  The old
templates
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>> definitely be
copied over, and then perhaps the 3.0 asual
>> theme
>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> dropped in and
selected, or maybe the bootstrap contents
> could
>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> appended?  That
way each blog would at least be working
after
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hmmmm, it should've
copied the contents of the old blog's
>>>>>> properties
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> templates directory
into the new blog's directory (as well as
>>>>>>> copying
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> resources for each
blog). I'll take a look to see that that
>>>> aspect
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> upgrade is working
properly.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> That's it for
now, I'll have some more time to play with it
>>>>>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original
Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>> From:
blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>>
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net] On
>>>>>> Behalf
>>>>>>>>> Of
>>>>>>>>>>> davidblojsom.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday,
October 03, 2006 8:06 PM
>>>>>>>>>>> To:
blojsom-developerslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re:
[Blojsom-developers] Blojsom 3 available (also
>>>>>> blojsom
>>>>>>>>>> 2->
>>>>>>>>>>> blojsom3
upgrade utility)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, just
curious if it *did* work, does that mean the
>> compile
>>>>>>> went
>>>>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>>>>>> or did
>>>>>>>>>>> you upgrade and
that went OK or both?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting
davidblojsom.com:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Quoting
"Kenneth M. Horan" <KHoranintelink.gov>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Got it,
works fine not.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, it did
or did not work?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Right now
I'm going through the new admin pages one by one
>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> applying
>>>>>>>>>>>> our changes
to the templates.  I've got a whole laundry
> list
>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>> compiled
from user suggestions, personal preference, and
>>>>>>>>>>> user-friendly
>>>>>>>>>>>>
improvements, and I have something for every single admin
>>>> page.
>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> would help
I could write down the changes as I'm making
> them
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> code
changes where applicable.  Would this be useful?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Improvements to the user experience and UI are always
>>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>> Are
>>>>>>>>>>> any of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
improvements or requests addressed in blojsom 3?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> From:
blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net]
> On
>>>>>>>> Behalf
>>>>>>>>>>> Of
>>>>>>>>>>>> David
Czarnecki
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent:
Friday, September 29, 2006 3:40 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: blojsom
developers
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject:
Re: [Blojsom-developers] Blojsom 3 available (also
>>>>>>>> blojsom
>>>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>>> ->
>>>>>>>>>>>> blojsom3
upgrade utility)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
Updated the build.xml in CVS and put a new source
>>>>>>>>>>> distribution
>>>>>>>>>>>> out there.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/29/06
3:19 PM, "Kenneth M. Horan"
> <KHoranintelink.gov>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> One little
hiccup with the source download. It seems it
>> wants
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> compile
>>>>>>>>>>>> the upgrade
folders but they're not included.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> BUILD
FAILED
>>>>>>>>>>>>
C:devblojsom3build.xml:218: C:devblojsom3upgrade-lib
>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> found.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> From:
blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>
[mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> <mailto:blojsom-developers-bounceslists.sourceforge.net%5d>
>>>>> On
>>>>>>>>>>> Behalf
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of David
Czarnecki
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent:
Friday, September 29, 2006 3:03 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>> To:
blojsom-users; blojsom developers
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject:
[Blojsom-developers] Blojsom 3 available (also
>>>> blojsom
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>> ->
>>>>>>>>>>>> blojsom3
upgrade utility)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blojsom 3
is now available.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> <http://wiki.blojsom.com/wiki/display/blojsom3/Abo
ut+blojsom>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> <http://wiki.blojsom.com/wiki/display/blojsom3/Abo
ut+blojsom>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blojsom 3
WAR file:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfi
les.php?group_id=72754&package_id=
>>>>>>>>>>>>
125988&release_id=451520>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfi
les.php?group_id=72754&package_id=
>>>>>>>>>>>>
125988&release_id=451520>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfi
les.php?group_id=72754&amp;package
>>>>>>>>>>>>
_id=125988&amp;release_id=451520>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfi
les.php?group_id=72754&package_id=
>>>>>>>>>>>>
125988&release_id=451520>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blojsom 3
source and other files:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfi
les.php?group_id=72754&package_id=
>>>>>>>>>>>>
72723&release_id=451482>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfi
les.php?group_id=72754&package_id=
>>>>>>>>>>>>
72723&release_id=451482>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfi
les.php?group_id=72754&amp;package
>>>>>>>>>>>>
_id=72723&amp;release_id=451482>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfi
les.php?group_id=72754&package_id=
>>>>>>>>>>>>
72723&release_id=451482>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The
blojsom 2 -> blojsom 3 upgrade utility is
> available
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> download
from this location.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've put a
page up on the wiki detailing instructions on
>>>>>>> upgrading
>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>> blojsom 2
to blojsom 3.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://wiki.blojsom.com/wiki/display/bloj
som3/Upgrading+from+blojsom+2+
>>>>>>>>>>>>
to+blojsom+3>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
<http://wiki.blojsom.com/wiki/display/bloj
som3/Upgrading+from+blojsom+2+
>>>>>>>>>>>>
to+blojsom+3>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you are
upgrading, please a) backup your blojsom 2
>>>>>>> installation
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> blog data
before proceeding and b) read through the
>>>>> instructions
>>>>>>>>>>>> carefully.
If there are any points which need
> clarification,
>>>>> let
>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>>>>>> and I'll
update the wiki page. I've tried to make it as
>>>>> painless
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bugs,
improvements, etc. may be made in JIRA,
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://jira.blojsom.com/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://jira.blojsom.com/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa>
.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> David
Czarnecki
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.blojsom.com/b
log/ | http://blojsom.sf.net
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>> Take
Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>>>>>>>>>>> Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
>> chance
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> share your
>>>>>>>>>>>> opinions on
IT & business topics through brief surveys --
> and
>>>>>> earn
>>>>>>>>>>> cash
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.p
hp?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
>>>>>>>>>>> V
>>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Blojsom-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Blojsom-developerslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bloj
som-developers
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> Take Surveys.
Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>>>>>>>>>> Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
> chance
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> share
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> opinions on IT
& business topics through brief surveys --
and
>>>>> earn
>>>>>>>>>> cash
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.p
hp?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
>>>>>>>>>>> V
>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>
Blojsom-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>
Blojsom-developerslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bloj
som-developers
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> Take Surveys.
Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>>>>>>>>>> Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
> chance
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> share your
>>>>>>>>>>> opinions on IT
& business topics through brief surveys --
and
>>>>> earn
>>>>>>>>>> cash
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
http://www.techsay.com/default.p
hp?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
>>>>>>>>>> V
>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>
Blojsom-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>
Blojsom-developerslists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bloj
som-developers

-- 
David Czarnecki

http://www.blojsom.com/b
log/ | http://blojsom.sf.net



------------------------------------------------------------
------------
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to
make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on
Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/
sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Blojsom-developers mailing list
Blojsom-developerslists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bloj
som-developers

------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to
make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on
Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/
sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Blojsom-developers mailing list
Blojsom-developerslists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bloj
som-developers
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )