Andrei Melnikov wrote:
> On 27/06/06, Andrei Melnikov <andy.melnikov gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 24/06/06, Reece Dunn <msclrhd hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Andrei Melnikov wrote:
> > > > Patch version 2.
> > > > - No cl.exe command line duplication any
more, including compile.pch rule
> > > > - Whitespace cleanup: tab fix from my
previous patch, some trailing
> > > > space removal
> > >
> > > Very nice! I have applied this to my local
BBv2 branch and built a project
> > > without any problems. This has my vote .
> >
> > Unfortunately, it doesn't work as expected. Full
builds are ok, but
> > incremental builds fail. I think it's because
it's incorrect to invoke
> > build rules with actions from other rules this
way. Can someone help?
> >
> LOL... I just used -n switch for incremental build in
VS... No wonder
> that it didn't work.
> Could someone test my refactorings under Cygwin and
review the code
> for possible flaws? I'm really afraid of checking
changes in just
> because "they just work", without
multiplatform testing and a peer
> code review.
I merged your changes into BBv2 on my machine and I always
use the
bash/cygwin environment. I have been succesfully using your
patch for
a while now .
- Reece
____________________________________________________________
_____
Try Live.com: where your online world comes together - with
news, sports, weather, and much more.
http://www.live.com/ge
tstarted
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
a>
|