Liking to pthreads

David Abrahams <daveboost-consulting.com> writes:

> Vladimir Prus <ghostcs.msu.su> writes:
>
>> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 00:09, David Abrahams
wrote:
>>
>>> >> Why not that, too?
>>> >
>>> > Because I did not see obvious use case for
that. And <threading>multi is
>>> > non-free so it can be passed via usage
requirements anyway at the moment.
>>>
>>> ??  If it is non-free and can be passed via
usage requirements, this
>>> exact capability would be useful.
>>
>> Sorry, "can" should be
"can't". Non-free features can't be passed via
usage 
>> requirements.
>
> Why not?  

No answer?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build