Roland Schwarz wrote:
> Prashant Thakre wrote:
>> Visual C++ .NET 2005 - msvc 8.0
>> Visual C++ .NET 2003 - msvc 7.1
>> Visual C++ .NET 2002 - msvc 7.0
>> Visual C++ 6.0 - msvc 6.0
>
> For me the naming does not appear that homogeneous, I
have:
>
> Visual Studio 6.0 -> msvc 6.0
> Visual Studio .NET -> msvc 7.0
> Visual Studio .NET 2003 -> msvc 7.1
> Visual Studio 2005 -> msvc 8.0
>
At least for me, the term "Visual Studio" isn't
interchangeable with "Visual
C++". Visual C++ is a part of Visual Studio, namely the
C++ compiler and
corresponding IDE integration.
OTOH, as of Visual Studio 2005 (and perhaps earlier), it's
not possible to
buy VC++ separately. IMHO the most correct names would be:
Visual C++ 2005 - msvc 8.0
Visual C++ .NET 2003 - msvc 7.1
Visual C++ .NET 2002 - msvc 7.0
Visual C++ 6.0 - msvc 6.0
Don't know how that works for the "general public"
though.
/ Johan
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
|