List Info

Thread: Re: Improving Boost Build?




Re: Improving Boost Build?
user name
2007-05-22 07:52:52
Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:

[deleted]
>    When you build something using the msvc toolset all
the parameters 
> passed to compilers/linkers get packaged into response
files. When you 
> look at the shell commands bjam executes you just see
the 
> compiler/linker call with the name of the response file
passed as a 
> parameter. To see exactly which compiler/linker
parameters were used you 
> need to open that response file but if a
compiler/linker call fails then 
> its corresponding response file gets deleted together
with any other 
> partially built targets. :-(
>
>    Best regards,
>      Jurko Gospodnetić
>   

You might want to look at the current msvc.jam.  It doesn't
delete the
response files.  Also, -d2 dumps the response file in
addition to
showing the command-line (I'm not sure what does that,
though -- it may
be bjam).

Phillip

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
Re: Improving Boost Build?
user name
2007-05-22 09:37:14
   Hi Phillip.

> You might want to look at the current msvc.jam.  It
doesn't delete the
> response files.  Also, -d2 dumps the response file in
addition to
> showing the command-line (I'm not sure what does that,
though -- it may
> be bjam).

   Thanks... I'll have a look at it. Just hope we can still
make the 
clean rule correctly delete these files - as we did for the
milestone 11 
  release.

   Btw. anyone know when the next milestone release is
planned?

   Best regards,
     Jurko Gospodnetić

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )