Why no "--no-undefined" linker flag?

On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:54, eracce wrote:
> I'm wondering why the "-Wl,--no-undefined"
flag is not set by default so the
> linker won't allow unresolved symbols from object files
when building shared
> libraries.
> Perhaps even "Wl,--no-allow-shlib-undefined"
should be used?
> 
> I'm just curious why these flags were not used. I think
they are quite
> necessary. Am I missing something?

If those flags are not default in gcc, why they should be
default in
Boost.Build? 

- Volodya

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build